My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Jun26
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Jun26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:31:16 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:15:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Petition <br />Area # 1: north of 1844 and 1894 Tatum Street <br />to 1888 and 1920 Tatum Street (75%) <br />(3 of the 16 property owners did not sign the petition - no <br />reason was submitted with the petition.) <br />Petition <br />Area # 2: south of 1791 and 1794 Tatum Street <br />to 1739 and 1736 Tatum Street (82%) <br />(2 of the 3 property owners not signing were out of town <br />or absentee owners and could not be reached by the <br />petitioner. ) <br />D. Response to notices. <br />From petitioners. Staff notified all Tatum Street property owners of the public <br />hearing on permit parking. As of this writing no property owners in the <br />petitioned areas contacted the staff about the hearing. <br />From non-petitioners. Since residential permit parking would potentially affect <br />• all Tatum Street residents and possibly be desired by more than the petitioned <br />areas, the staff felt it was appropriate to consider the street as a whole rather <br />than the petitioned areas only. Therefore, in addition to sending the notice to <br />the petitioned areas, staff notified property owners in the non-petitioned areas <br />with a bright flier and a stamped, addressed card requesting that the property <br />owners notify the city about their interest in permit parking. As of this writing, <br />the 10 of the 27 property owners responded with interest in residential permit <br />parking; 1 property owner responded neutrally as long as she did not have to <br />pay for a permit; and 4 property owners stated they had no interest in permit <br />parking. <br />Three of the four property owners expressing a disinterest in residential permit <br />parking explained that they felt the parking restrictions were working well and <br />that there was no need to have anyone park for more than two hours on the <br />street, M - F, 8 AM to 4 PM because residents' driveways should be adequate. <br />Mr. Chrun, who initiated the two hour parking restriction study, was one of <br />these individuals. <br />E. Analysis. <br />When residential permit parking is requested, staff is required to verify the <br />petitions as well as to analyze the need for permit parking. The staff is also <br />• <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.