Laserfiche WebLink
• .street during these weekday hours. <br />• The posting would preclude the necessity of property owners submitting <br />additional petitions with additional fees when it became necessary for <br />property owners to have the permit parking. <br />Life cycles of neighborhoods change. Currently some residents' <br />driveways may easily accommodate their family's vehicles for the time- <br />being. However, as residents change and families change, a need for <br />residential permit parking may emerge. For example, single homeowners <br />or those with young children frequently do not need to parkin the street. <br />However, families with high school or 'live-at-home' adult children may <br />require additional parking. <br />The third alternative, posting north of 1733 and 1728 Tatum, would not <br />inconvenience anyone to the staff's knowledge since the property <br />owners did not respond to the notice. These residents/property owners <br />are accustomed to the 2 hour parking restrictions, which have been in <br />that location for some time. However, once the availability of the <br />parking is made known, they may find it desirable. If the commission <br />recommended the third alternative, 69% of the property owners in this <br />posted area would have expressed a need for residential permit parking <br />• compared to 61 % under alternative #4. <br />• <br />6 <br />