Laserfiche WebLink
ENDNOTES <br />1. Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd. 2. <br />2. Minn. Stat. § §473.851 - 473.871. <br />3. Minn. Stat. §473.865, Subd. 2. <br />4. Minn. Stat. § §462.357, Subd. 2; 473.858, Subd.1. <br />5. Kehr v. City of Roseville, 426 N.W.2d 233 (Minn.App.1988); Amoco Oil Co. v. <br />City of Minneapolis, 395 N.W.2d 1 15 (Minn.App.19861. <br />6. Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66 (Minn.1984). <br />7. BBY Investors, v. City of Maplewood, 467 N.W.2d 631 (Minn.App.1991); <br />Amoco Oil v. City of Minneapolis, 395 N.W.2d 1 15 (Minn.App.1986). <br />8. Hay v. City of Andover, 436 N.W.2d 800 (Minn.App.1989). <br />9. Minn. Stat. §462.355, Subd. 4. <br />c: <br />10. Woodbury Place Partners v. City of Woodbury, 492 N.W.2d 258 <br />(Minn.App.1992). • <br />1 1. Almquist v. Town of Marshan, 308 Minn. 52, 245 N.W.2d 819 (1976); TPW, <br />Inc. v. City of New Hope, 388 N.W.2d 390 (Minn.App.1986); Carl Bolander & <br />Sons v. City of Minneapolis, 378 N.W.2d 826 (Minn.App.1985). <br />12. Chase v. City of Minneapolis, 401 N.W.2d 408 (1981); Medical Services, Inc. <br />v. City of Savage. 487 N.W.2d 263 (Minn.App. 1992). <br />13. Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd. 6(2). <br />14. /d. <br />15. Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Moorhead, 446 N.W.2d 917 <br />(Minn.App.1989). <br />16. Luger v. City of Burnsville, 295 N.W.2d 609 (Minn.1980). <br />17. Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd.6(2). <br />18. Dedering v. Johnson, 307 Minn. 313, 239 N.W.2d 913 (Minn.1976); Tuckner <br />v. Township of May, 419 N.W.2d 836 (Minn.App.1988). <br />12 • <br />