My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Mar27
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Mar27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:32:08 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:29:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />February 22, 1995 <br />• Page 3 <br />purpose of placing them in the administrative manual is to have a reference for staff, <br />residents, and business so that everyone knows up front what the rules are and how <br />to comply with city ordinances. <br />Councilmember Hustad asked about residential parking permits and why they are <br />issued only to certain apartment residents. <br />Administrator Hoyt responded that they are issued to those apartments who do not <br />have sufficient off-street parking and rely upon on-street parking year-round. Most <br />single-family residential homes have a driveway and at least a single car garage that <br />can accommodate multiple cars, even if that means shuffling cars for the short <br />duration of the state fair. In the past, permits have on occasion been issued to single <br />family homeowners for truly unique circumstances that require on-street parking. The <br />idea is to have residents use off-street parking first, even if it is a short-term <br />inconvenience, an use on-street parking as a last resort. <br />Councilmember Hustad suggested that staff err on the side of giving out permits to <br />residents who request them, rather than restricting them. <br />• Mayor Baldwin stated that residents do not have a right to a parking space on a public <br />street -the street is not an extension of private property. The apartments are a unique <br />situation, as there is no other alternative but for those residents to park on the street. <br />Councilmember Gibson Talbot commented that if staff started deviating from <br />guidelines, the city may end up with many, many applications for on-street parking in <br />the residential areas. Councilmember Hustad acknowledged that the deviations would <br />be a judgement call by the staff and suggested that a log of requests be kept during <br />the 1995 Fair. <br />Councilmember Jacobs questioned the cost of distributing a flyer regarding the Fair <br />rules to households. He suggested, and received concurrence from the council, that <br />coverage of the topic in the city newsletter would be adequate to inform residents. <br />Motion was made by Councilmember Jacobs to approve the addition of Section IIID <br />to the city's administrative manual. Motion carried unanimously. <br />REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO NEGOTIATE <br />FOR A NEW FEE STRUCTURE FOR PROSECUTIONS <br />• Administrator Hoyt explained that the city currently pays an hourly rate for <br />prosecution services. She suggested that the city begin negotiations for a retainer fee <br />structure, as the prosecution workload is expected to increase with a 24 hour <br />designated officer with the St. Anthony Police Department in the city limits. Hoyt <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.