My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_94Sep26
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
PCAgenda_94Sep26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:15:59 AM
Creation date
7/7/2009 8:27:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Falcon Heights <br />Planning Commission <br />September 26, 1994 <br />ITEM: Request for variance in chapter 9 §4.01 subd.4(c,l of <br />the zoning code for 1437 W. California Avenue <br />SUBMITTED BY: James LeJeune and Donna Tretheway, Property Owners <br />REVIEWED BY: Carla Asleson, Administrative Assistant/Planner <br />Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br />REQUEST <br />A variance of 26.2 feet from the required 30 foot rear yard <br />setback to construct a new attached double car garage <br />BACKGROUND <br />The applicants propose to convert the existing attached one car <br />garage into a family room and add an attached double car garage <br />and a bathroom (see attachment 1). If approved, the new garage <br />would have the access door on the alley 3.8' from the rear <br />property line. The applicants have pulled building permits to <br />begin work on the family room and bathroom portion of the <br />remodeling. If the variance is denied, the applicants have less <br />desirable, alternative plans to construct a detached garage at <br />• proper setback (see attachment 2). <br />The 30' setback requirement was written with the assumption that <br />all attached garages would be accessed off of a public street. <br />This particular request shows a rear setback of 3.8' feet from <br />the alley. If the garage were detached and accessed from the <br />alley, the minimum setback would be 5'. This particular garage <br />is about as narrow as a double car garage can be (20'). The 1.2' <br />encroachment is the minimum needed to attach the garage to the <br />existing structure. <br />COMMENTS FROM NEIGHBORS <br />Letters were sent to the neighbors to the immediate east and west <br />of the subject property, informing them of the variance request. <br />Mr. LeJeune submitted a letter, signed by both property owners, <br />indicating that they have no objections to the variance request <br />(see attachment 3). <br />ANALYSIS <br />There are three hardship statements associated with this request: <br />• Without a variance, the homeowner will have to build a <br />detached double garage in the northeast corner of the lot <br />with a garage door off of the alley. This alternative plan <br />is less desirable in that several trees on the east side of <br />the property would need to be removed. <br />• The alternative plan would also involve building the garage <br />in the largest contiguous landscaped area of the lot, <br />breaking up the greenspace of the yard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.