My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_94Mar28
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
PCAgenda_94Mar28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:13:33 AM
Creation date
7/7/2009 9:05:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ITEM 3 <br />• City of Falcon Heights <br />Planning Commission <br />28 March 1994 <br />ITEM: Consideration for a request for a variance to Chapter 9 - 4.01 <br />Subdivision 4 of fifteen feet three inches (15' 3") to the required <br />thirty foot rear yard setback, and to Chapter 9 - 2.04 Subdivision 1(c) <br />of two feet three inches (2'3") to the required five foot side yard <br />setback for 1775 Asbury Street <br />SUBMITTED BY: Theodore Wiger, property owner <br />REVIEWED BY: Phil Carlson, AICP, planning consultant <br />Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br />ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM FEBRUARY 28, 1994 MEETING: <br />Commission suggestion. The planning commission deferred the decision on the <br />request for a variance for a sideyard and rearyard setback as requested by Mr. <br />• Wiger until the March 28, 1994 meeting in order to permit the property owner, Mr. <br />Wiger, to revise his proposed construction plans to require a less substantial <br />variance request than the one presented to the commission (see minutes and <br />attachment 1). <br />Communication with Mr. Wiger. On March 1, 1994 Mr. Wiger stopped by city hall <br />to ask what his next step should be regarding the variance request. Staff <br />explained that the commission suggested that he revise his plans so he does not <br />require a substantial rear yard variance. Staff asked that plans be submitted by <br />March 18 so they could be reviewed prior to the agenda being prepared for the <br />planning commission meeting. This was followed up with a letter (attachment 2-. <br />After Phil Carlson further researched the city's non-conforming use requirements as <br />they apply to existing setbacks, Phil confirmed that Mr. Wiger would need a <br />variance even if he maintained the current rear and front yard setback because <br />they are at 28 feet rather the required 30 feet (attachment 3). (A non-conforming <br />sideyard setback does not need a variance.) Staff informed Mr. Wiger of this by <br />letter on March 9, 1994 (attachment 4). <br />Although Mr. Wiger stopped by city hall for information on city setback <br />requirements for all types of uses (garages, driveways, fences, additions) in early <br />March, as of this writing staff has not received plans nor heard from Mr. Wiger <br />• about his plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.