Laserfiche WebLink
Plannning Commission <br />Date: 8/23/93 <br />Agenda Item: 6 <br />• <br />Item: Consideration of the adoption of the Uniform Housing Code with some <br />revisions <br />Submitted by: Susan. Hoyt, City Administrator <br />Reviewed by: Dave Kriesel, Building Official <br />Brian Standing, intern <br />Explanation/description: <br />Two years ago staff recommended to the planning commission and city council <br />that the city adopt a housing code to use in the rare instances when residents <br />health and. safety is threatened by the condition of a dwelling unit. The <br />Ramsey County environmental inspector said that it is easier for Ramsey <br />County health officials to enforce health standards when a local housing code is <br />in place. <br />Most older cities adopt housing codes, like building codes, to assure that the <br />cities' built environment is maintained. Many cities use a housing code only <br />when a possible threat to health and safety has been identified whereas others <br />use a "truth-in-housing" program where a house must meet the housing code <br />prior to the sale of a structure. <br />After some research, the staff recommends adopting the Uniform Housing Code <br />now to have in place when situations arise that may be a threat to public health <br />and safety at this time. Ramsey County health officials working with the city's <br />building official, fire marshal and mechanical inspector would carry out these <br />inspections. <br />The staff recommends considering a program for issuing "certificates of <br />occupancy" for apartment buildings in the future. However, prior to <br />implementing a program like this, it will be necessary to determine who will <br />carry out the inspections, how frequently they should be made and how the <br />costs will be covered. <br />Depending upon the condition of homes at sale, the city may also consider a <br />"truth -in-housing" program in the future. <br /> <br />