Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />By JANE MCCLUItE <br />The advent of the videocassette <br />recorder, and rental videotapes, has <br />added a whole new dimens[on to St. <br />Paul's so-called adult entertainment <br />industry. <br />The St. Paul City Councii voted <br />unanimously March 25 to approve <br />n ? nterim city ordinance, to regulate <br />adult bookstores. The interim ordi- <br />nancewill be inplace until a study <br />can be conducted, Office of License <br />coons and Environmental Pro- <br />ion Director Bob Kessler told <br />council members. <br />The study, to be conducted by <br />the St. Paul Department of Planning <br />and Economic Development, will ex• <br />amine the impact adult-oriented <br />businesses have on a surrounding <br />neighborhood, said Kessler. The study <br />will be much like one conducted in <br />1988, that examined areas near adult <br />bookstores and theaters. That study <br />was a critical part of efforts that <br />eventually shut down the notorious <br />Faust and Flick theaters at Dale and <br />University. <br />The interim ordinance is needed <br />because aspects of adult businesses <br />have changed since the first study <br />was conducted, Kessler explained. <br />Since that study was completed, the <br />video rental industry has boomed, <br />with outlets throughout the city. <br />While video rental stores per se <br />are not a problem, at issue are stores <br />that rent a significant or substantial <br />amount ofadult-oriented materials. <br />One problem found with the 1988 or- <br />dinance iswhether the amount of <br />floor space In a business should be <br />used to determine what is a "signifi- <br />cant" or "substantial" amount of <br />adult oriented material. <br />The need for an interim ordi- <br />nance,and new study of adult busi- <br />ness,arose as a result of a dispute with <br />Mike Stoderl, owner of two video <br />stores in SL Paul. One of those stores, <br />Exstacy House Video, is at 916.918 Uni- <br />versity Avenue.ln February, a US. Dis- <br />trict Court judge ruled that the city's <br />current zoning restrictions on adult <br />businesses are constitutional, under <br />the adult entertainment zoning ordi- <br />nanceprepared in 1988. The case was <br />the first legal challenge to that ordi- <br />nance,which arose out of a study of <br />the negative secondary effects such <br />businesses have on a neighborhood. <br />Stoderi's attorney, Randall <br />Tfgue, has said he will appeal the <br />February ruling to the Eighth U.S. <br />Circuit Court of Appeals. <br />One issue in Stoderl's dispute <br />with the city is how much adult-ori- <br />ented material is too much, and what <br />is considered a "significant" or "sub- <br />stantial" amount under the city code. <br />Stoderl is currently interpreting the <br />code to mean that patrons of all ages <br />must be allowed access to every part <br />of his store, even though "adult" <br />videos are rented there. <br />When the store opened, it had <br />100 percent adult-oriented merchan- <br />dice. But Stoderl then rented the store <br />next door, put in a door between the <br />two stores and filled the new part of <br />the store with videos that aren't <br />"adult" in nature. That decreased the <br />percent of adult material in the store <br />to less than 40 percent. <br />The interim ordinance on adult <br />businesses goes into place at a time <br />when the city is looking at the next <br />step to take with another problematic <br />type of adult business. In early Mareh, <br />the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled <br />that five owners of St. Paul saunas <br />cannot be prosecuted on previous <br />charges of creating a public nuisance. <br />The ruling brings to a close a de- <br />bate that has been waged for many <br />months, over a state public nuisance <br />statute and how it was used here. <br />The statute, developed at the request <br />of the city of Minneapolis, allows <br />public officials to shut down such <br />businesses after a certain number of <br />prostitution orprostitution-related <br />convictions in a two-year period. <br />St. Paul's case against the five <br />saunas, including Lee Lenore's at 740 <br />Snelling Avenue and the Speakeasy, <br />927 University Avenue, was thrown <br />out because the businesses weren't <br />given timely notice of such convic- <br />tions.Business owners contended <br />they didn't learn of the attempt to <br />close their businesses under the <br />statute, until the city prepared law- <br />suits seeking to seize property and <br />close buildings. <br />A sixth sauna initially involved <br />in the case, the Red Carpet, has <br />closed. First located on Grand Av- <br />enue,the business relocated on ['^ <br />versity Avenue in the same bus::: <br />now occupied by the controversiai <br />Exstacy House: <br />The Appeals Court upheld a rul- <br />ing by Ramsey County District <br />Court Judge Charles Flinn Jr. that <br />the city should have given each <br />sauna owner notice, each time that <br />sauna employees were convicted of <br />acts of prostitution. Without notice, <br />judges argued that the businesses <br />didn't have a chance to remedy <br />problems themselves. <br />But with new nuisance lawsuits <br />in the works against some of the <br />saunas, due to new prostitution con- <br />victionsand proper notice, the con- <br />troversy may resurface in a new <br />court case brought by the city. <br />C' <br />