My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_93Mar22
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1993
>
PCAgenda_93Mar22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 4:05:44 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 11:34:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A <br />February 2, 1993 <br />• <br />Enclosed is application, explanation, and site plan to raise the existing five foot fence to eight <br />feet. <br />The area in yellow is now fenced at five feet around the rear yard, three feet between houses to <br />east and west and continuing to within three feet of public sidewalk (the required set back). <br />To put our fence in scale and attempt to minimize the 4-car garage at 1433 Idaho and to alleviate <br />somewhat, if possible, possible loss of property values, we propose the following. <br />1. Remove east and west rear fences and reinstall them between the houses not to <br />extend beyond the house or into the front yard. <br />2. Replace this fence that has been removed with a six foot fence which would have <br />a visually pleasing two foot lattice top, for a total height of eight feet -all fencing <br />to match existing white maintenance-free vinyl. <br />3. To take the existing three foot fence between the houses (that would be replaced <br />with the new rear fencing) and join to the front three foot fencing extending across <br />the front of property, ending on each side of my sidewalk (three foot set back from <br />public walk). A four foot brick pillar would be installed at end of this fencing by <br />my sidewalk with brass lamps on each post for a visually pleasing entrance to the <br />house. <br />In referring to subdivision 4 (Standards for Granting a Variance), the following statements are <br />true: <br />a. It will not be detrimental to public welfare. <br />b. It will not diminish or impair property values in the area. <br />c. It is necessary for us to preserve and enjoy the substantial rights of our garden <br />(which has been photographed by a nursery for a magazine publication). <br />d. It will not impair supply of light and air to adjacent property. <br />e. It will not impair use of public streets. <br />f. It will not endanger public safety. <br />g. The five garages at 1427 certainly distinguish it from all other properties. This <br />fence is unique but very beautiful as there are substantial plantings and trees that <br />incorporate the fencing to the property. Fencing is also the same material used <br />in a $10,000 replacement of all windows to the house that was done two years <br />ago. <br />• h. The fence does increase my property value and could result in financial loss <br />(because of the garage that is such a "monstrosity" and so "ridiculous" fora 5-car <br />garage on a 50-foot lot. This is a direct quote of a Board member at the meeting <br />of the Board when they granted variances to leave the 4-car garage stand. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.