My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_93Jan25
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1993
>
PCAgenda_93Jan25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 3:54:54 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 11:42:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
£. <br />C~ <br />January 16, 1993 <br />-~. ~.~ . 1G~~ <br />Members of the Planning Commission <br />City of Falcon Heights <br />Dear Members; <br />To give each of you ample time before the meeting on Monday, <br />January 25, to study the problem of the garage in question, we <br />have enclosed pertinent correspondence to date. <br />We hope each of you will find the time, not just for a drive-by, <br />but to actually walk into both adjoining yards (to the east & the <br />west) so you may observe the full impact of this way out-of-code <br />building. <br />We will have photos of our garden in summer available at the <br />meeting - and you will also be able on your visit to see the long <br />high bare wall the Callahans face. A drive by the front of the <br />property will show you the 5th garage. Mr William Cushman of <br />Appraisal Research Associates calls for "Falcon Heights to make <br />sure such situations do not occur since property values will <br />suffer." <br />A permit or variance to allow this building to remain in its <br />present size is a license to steal from the adjoining property <br />owners. To insist that the garage be downsized is not <br />unreasonable and as the city has insurance to cover the costs for <br />its admitted mistake. Any deductible that would not be covered <br />should come from city funds. <br />A grant for a variance for a 4-car garage sets a precedent for <br />future requests for such a garage - we cannot say one person can <br />do it, and another cannot. This is discrimination and could lead <br />to lawsuits. <br />To allow 5 garage stalls on a 50 ft. lot is unacceptable. There <br />would be room to park 4 cars in the new garage, 4 cars on that <br />driveway, a car in the front garage, a car on the front driveway, <br />and 3 or 4 cars on the street in front of the house - or a <br />possible total of 14 cars parked in and around a 50 ft. lot in <br />residential Falcon Heights. Even with all the garages available <br />the Callahans are subjected to a car always parked on the front <br />driveway in view of his living and dining room windows and his <br />summer porch. <br />• - <br />k -~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.