Laserfiche WebLink
• Draft Conditions for Amusement Establishments Falcon Heights Page 2 <br />Another test of a regulation's appropriateness is whether it represents a reasonable <br />means to a legal end. Regulations must be reasonably related to the problem that they <br />are intended to control. If the regulation is harsh or unreasonable it may violate the <br />principal of due process, which states that no person may be deprived of life, liberty, <br />or property under circumstances that are unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. <br />The third issue to be aware of when considering new regulations involves the equal <br />protection clause of the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution. To meet this <br />requirement the regulation must be nondiscriminatory and there must be some rational <br />basis for subjecting a particular group to it. <br />The first condition in the CUP for J.J.'s Pool and Game Arcade deals with hours of <br />operation and has been included in the proposed conditions virtually unchanged. <br />Restricting the hours of operation to midnight is consistent with the City's curfew for <br />minors between the ages of 16 and 17. In addition, this restriction reduces the <br />possibility for disruption in the adjacent residential areas during those hours when a <br />majority of residents are sleeping. <br />Condition number two of the J.J.'s permit has been eliminated due to its site specific <br />nature. More specific conditions regarding parking can be incorporated at the time an <br />actual application is considered. <br />• The third condition from the J.J.'s permit prohibits entering the establishment from the <br />rear of the building. Since the retail buildings in the City of Falcon Heights are <br />generally located with the rear of the building facing an adjacent residential area, <br />restricting entry from the rear of the building could help reduce the potential of <br />loitering and other undesired activity in this area. For this reason this condition has <br />been retained in the list of proposed conditions. One word of caution, there may be <br />some structures where a side entry is adjacent to a residential property and in that <br />case the wording for the condition may need to be revised to address this situation at <br />the time. the permit is issued. <br />The third condition in our current list, labelled C, requires an approved security plan <br />for amusement establishments. The intent here is to establish a comprehensive method <br />for dealing with the issues that are generally the most problematic for this type of use. <br />In addition, requiring the plan to be approved by the local law enforcement officials <br />insures that these officials are aware of the establishment and that they have had input <br />regarding its design and operation with a mind toward making the job of policing it as <br />easy as possible. The key word in this condition is "implementation", we want to make <br />sure the security plan is followed and not just prepared and ignored. Basically, this <br />condition covers the issues addressed in items 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 of the previous permit <br />for J.J.'s. <br />We believe Condition number 7 in the permit for J.J.'s is discriminatory and therefore, <br />violates the principal of equal protection. There is no basis for assuming that allowing <br />a person, previously convicted of a felony, to work at the establishment will result in it <br />being any more or less compatible with the surrounding residential area. <br />• Item 10 of the J.J.'s permit has been revised to eliminate the language about the <br />maintenance of health, safety, and welfare. This language is awkward. In the broadest <br />