Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />CONDITION 3: The back door will be an exit only, conforming <br />to Fire Code. <br />CONDITION 6: The property owner will post on the exterior <br />of the premises "no loitering" and will <br />prevent any loitering in common areas within <br />the building or in the parking areas and <br />sidewalks adjacent to the building. <br />CONDITION 9: Game room management will take all reasonable <br />action to expel intoxicated persons and will <br />allow no disorderly conduct on the premises, <br />parking areas and adjacent sidewalks. <br />CONDITION 10: Adequate adult supervision will be provided <br />until one-half hour after closing to ensure <br />that the health, safety and welfare and <br />existing community standards of peace and <br />quiet are maintained. At Council's <br />discretion, additional supervisory and/or <br />security personnel may be required. <br />EVIDENCE OF VIOLATIONS <br />The Roseville police report indicated that patrons used the rear <br />• exit (Condition 3). The report also indicated that patrons were <br />fighting inside as well as outside the business on the sidewalk <br />and in the parking lots (Conditions 6, 9, 10). Patrons also <br />removed the "No loitering" signs from the premises (Condition <br />6). The nine police calls to the business relating to fights <br />and assaults represent 47 percent of all assault related police <br />calls in the City during 1990. This clearly indicates a <br />disruption to the existing community standards of peace and <br />quiet (Condition 10). <br />Messrs. Joe and Jim Sacco indicated that during the first nine <br />months of operation there were no problems. However, during the <br />past year a small percentage of their patrons caused recurring <br />difficulties. The owners attempted to control these problems by <br />immediately evicting trouble-making patrons. However, they said <br />they cannot anticipate assaults and fights nor totally control <br />problems on property outside the business. The business owners <br />indicated that controlling the rear exit was impossible because <br />patrons entered J.J.'s establishment through the rear entrances <br />of the adjacent businesses, which was unpopular with the <br />adjoining business owners and defeated the purpose of <br />controlling the rear exit of J.J.'s. <br />POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS <br />City staff proposed three solutions to assist the business <br />operations in meeting the required conditions. First, city <br />staff suggested hiring two uniformed security guards in addition <br />• <br />