Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> <br />Meeting Date 8-27-90 <br />Agenda Item E-3 <br />Attachment 4 <br />MEMORANDUM: <br />TO: Planning Commission <br />FROM: Susan Hoyt, City Planner <br />RE: Request for a variance from section 9-2.04(2)(d) and 9- <br />13.04 (6) (a) of the zoning code for 1586 Burton <br />After viewing the site at 1586 Burton and discussing the project <br />plans and alternatives with Mr. Close, the project architect, the <br />following points may be reiterated from Mr. Close's letter: <br />1) Rear yard/side yard <br />As Mr. Close states in his letter, the existing 17 ft. rear <br />yard is actually designed to conform to the side yard of the <br />house at 2190 Burton. If this was actually defined as a side <br />yard, the setback would meet the required 5 ft. Neighboring <br />property setbacks are 9 ft. for 1578 Burton and probably less <br />than 10 ft. for 2190 Burton. <br />2) Description of the site and neighboring views <br />The proposed plan is significantly less disruptive to the <br />topography, landscape and the neighbors' views than if the <br />garage were placed in either sideyard, which would not require <br />a variance. <br />3) Driveway access <br />The zoning code limits single family homes to one access <br />drive. In part, this is to prevent paving over a large area <br />to get "circle drives". This unusual two access plan does not <br />propose to pave a large area, but to provide two single car <br />accessways 5 feet long. Because each accommodates only one <br />car, there should not be a safety problem, and the entrances <br />are carefully worked into the design of the garage. <br />In summary, this request for two variances may satisfy the <br />criterion for a unique site; and their approval may not <br />jeopardize the intent of the zoning code nor the visual <br />character of the streetscape and neighborhood. <br />