My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_90Jul23
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1990
>
PCAgenda_90Jul23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 3:04:22 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 3:05:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
restricts fences to three feet in height within the front yard <br />setback. <br />In order to qualify for a variance, the property owner must <br />demonstrate that there is a uniqueness and hardship to the use of <br />this property compared to other properties in the same zone (R-1) <br />to justify departing from the normal requirement of the zoning <br />code. Mr. Lammers identified two hardships to the commission. <br />1) noise from the traffic along Hamline Avenue, and 2) visual <br />blight from adjacent and directly opposite commercial land uses. <br />Mr. Lammers stated his house forms the barrier between the <br />commercial land uses at the intersection of Larpenteur and Hamline <br />Avenues. When he moved into his home in 1971, he planted a hedge <br />to block the view of Baber Auto. The hedge is now 90 percent dead <br />on the south side of the property adjacent to the Thatcher Clinic <br />and dying along the front of the property. Because the house was <br />built with a higher than average foundation, an eight foot high <br />fence is necessary to effectively block out visibility of <br />commercial property of Tires Plus and Baber Auto and to serve as <br />a barrier to noise and the increasing traffic volumes on Hamline <br />and Larpenteur. Furthermore, Mr. Lammers said a hedge is not a <br />good sound barrier nor visual buffer during the winter. Therefore, <br />he would like to install an 8 foot fence made of cedar split logs <br />fit snuggly together. He might cover it with Virginia Creeper <br />vines . <br />• Chairperson Boche asked if a unique hardship to this property <br />unlike other properties in R-1 zones exists and, if so, how? Mr. <br />Lammers stated looking out the windows of his home at a commercial <br />auto repair shop with a parking lot in front with long term parking <br />was visual blight. <br />Planner Hoyt reviewed her report of the variance request. She <br />stated that because 1697 North Hamline is 1) not unique due to <br />noise from traffic since several other homes in the city are <br />located on busy streets, 2) not unique due to the location adjacent <br />to a commercial property as there are several properties that are <br />adjacent to commercial uses (Bullseye, Northome, Super America), <br />and 3) that it might be considered unique because it is directly <br />across from a commercial service with vehicles always parked <br />outside. Chairperson Boche reminded everyone that in granting a <br />variance all standards must be met (attachment 1). <br />Planner Hoyt explained that a six foot fence along the south side <br />lot line would be in keeping with the zoning code which requires <br />a barrier between adjacent commercial parking places and R-1 zones . <br />She also said that if the Thatcher Clinic owners installed a six <br />foot fence along the clinic's rear lot line, a variance would not <br />be needed; only a building permit. Mr. Lammers stated that he <br />intended to have Dr. Thatcher construct the fence and he withdrew <br />• his request for a variance for an eight foot fence along the south <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.