PCAgenda_89Dec4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AGENDA ITEM E-1 ATTACHMENT H MINUTES ~~ ,AUGUST 9 , 19 89 `~ PAGE 2 • AMENDMENT OF CONDITIONAL PERMIT FOR AMUSEi~fiENT CENTER AT 1544 W. ~' LARPENTEUR, (JJ'S POOL ARCADE) APPROVED The owner of JJ's Pool & Arcade presented a request that the existing Conditional Use (Resolution R 89-5) be amended to allow the owners to employ only one person after 7:00 P.M. if business warrants it .and allow the business to stay open until 1:00 A.M. rather .than midnight 7 days per week. Wallin explained that at the Public Hearing on August 2, 1989, y-"+c,, ~ the Planning Commission unanimously recommended that the business be allowed to remain open until 1:00 A. M. on Friday and Saturday nights, that the owners be allowed to employ one person after 7:00 P. M. on Sunday through Thursday evenings, and that a review be requested of ter tree months. Following input f rom the owners Joseph and James Sacco and discussion by Council, Wallin moved adoption of Resolution R-89-18 amending Item 1 to allow the .business to remain open until 1:00 A. M. on Saturdays .and 1:00 A.M. on Sundays, and to allow one adult attendant after 7:0-0 P.M, if business does not warrant additional employees. A review period will be within 3 months at which time Council will discuss extending the 1:00 A.M. closing to other days of the week. Motion carried • unanimously. Council requested that owners provide more adequate signage for the. "No Right Turn on Arona" from the back parking lot. Council also assured the owners that the review to be held in three months will not require a fee. RESOLUTION R-89-18 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION R-89-S GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A GAME ARCADE AT 1544 W. LARPENTEUR (NORTHOME SHOPPING CENTER. ) DISCUSSION - POSSIBLE REDEVELOPMENT OF SE CORNER OF LARPENTEUR AND SNELLING John Grossman, re resentin Professional Ventures nc P g I ., developers interested in redeveloping the SE Corner of Larpenteur and Snelling, requested that Council give them some indication of whether or not it would be worthwhile to pursue the project as presented at the 6:0 O.P.M. workshop. Council concurred that they liked the concept but some members were concerned about the height of the proposed apartment building (5 st.ories). The developer was advised to contact Wiessner regarding a pre-development agreement.