PCAgenda_89Sep11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CEP 08 '^09 16~~1 trF«A P.2 • T0: David Slack FROM: Anne Carroll"-- kE: Comments on mater_'als for 9/11/89 San Francisco...) DATE: 9/8/89 Council]. Minutes: Thanks for these ! PC meeting (for which I will be in Item C, rtes: No changes. I'm pleased the PC moved to amend the CU ?e_+-mit. Good idea to review 9.n three months, tac. Item D, Swimming pool ordinance . As l recall we've ~dscussed t'tLS before and this version reflects a variety of anges; generally loolsrine to me, except: Correction: Pg 93, item 3a, "No pool shall not be"?? Delete "not"? . Question: Pg. 97, item D.7.2: "Ln the alternative" means what? As an alterna~.ive?... "befenced". Also, ff we allow perimeter fencing, we sh.ouid clarify: l) meeu same height requirements as fn 7.1, 2) say "entire perimeter", and 3) for final sentence, use language like "any svrimming pool fence and gates" or something ~o clarify that both pool and perimeter fences are included jn regulation. . Item D.7.3: "corrosicr_esis ~ .-:°" . Item D.7.3: ~iruno the wcoc. -.aineer (pnD., F.E.) says if the posts are made of wood you should ~ use concrete bases. Reference to decay and corrosion. resistant mate_-__.!s as appropriate, but for bases he recommends something like cc:~aacted pea gravel which allows water to drain. If concrete is used, i~ will retain. water and cause even decay resistant {treated) wcad tc decay. Concrete can be used as an anchor to reduce the necessary depth of the post, BUT if this Is done, the concrete can't surround the BASE of the posi, because the wood will shrink and water will infiltrate; i.e., ycu must use the wood and concrete in such a way that water can drain out. *** I trust such fence construction as subject to a bldg permit, so that ~~~ it's constructed properly; ii not, and ii we care to use regulations to help that such a fence really does prevent a child from drowning, we must include more specific construction requirements and/ar references Item E.1: Compc~s-ting recommendations . Question/Comment: Is a compost "area" an accessory structure and therefore subject to the seiback requrements? If noi, the language in the various sections should separate areas from structures and treat them accordingly. . Question/Comment: If we're going to refer to UofM standards, we need to clarify what department/division/group w/in the U has jurisdiction -- like Extension or whomever... Item E.2: T.RT Plan . just for the record, I've never been in favor of the version of LRT w/overhead electrical lines; i.f this is the only version under consideration, one of my major objectives would be to minimize the number of residential • •