PCAgenda_89Sep11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • SEP X08 ' S9 16 ~ 01 CF&A TO: David Black FRONT : Anne Carroll-- K~: Comments on materials San ~Yancisco... } DATE: 9/8/89 ~~~ ~ Thanks for these! P.c for 9/ll/89 PC meeting (for which I will be 3n Item C, Lltnutes: No changes. I+m pleased the pC moved to amend the CU Permit. Good 3r~ea to review in three months, too. Item D, Swfmmin9 Pool ordinance . As i recall we've ~dlscussed this before and this versi.an reflects a variety of ges; generally loalcs fine to me, except: Correction: Pg 93, :item 3a, "~fo pool shall nat be"?? Delete "not"? . Question: Pg. 97, Stem D.7.2: "In the alternative" means what? As an alternative?... ''befenced ". Also, if we allow pez~..meter fencing, we should clarify: 1) meets same height requirements as in 7.1, 2) say "entire perimeter ", and 3) far final sentence, use language ]ike "any swimming pool fence and gates" or something to clarify that both pool and per'..meter fences are Included In regulation. . Item D.7.3: "corros3onresirstant" . Item Ta.7.3: Bruno the wood engineer (phD., P,E.) says if the pests are made of wood you should NOT use concrete bases. Reference to decay and corrosion resistant materials is appropriate, but for bases he recommends something like compacted, pea gravel which allows water to drain. If concrete is used, it will retain water and cause even decay res9stant (treated) wood to decay. Concrete can be used as an anchor to reduce the necessary depth of the post, BUT if this is done, the concrete can't surround the BASE of the post, because the wood wi11 shrink and water will infi}.trate; i.e., You must use the wood and concrete in such a way that water can dram out. **~ I trust such fence construction ws subject to a bldg permit, so that it's constructed properly; if not, and if we care to use regulations to help that such a fence really does prevent a child from drowning, we must include more specific construction requirements and/or references Item E.1: Composting recommendations . Question/Comment: Is a compost "area" an accessory structure anal therefore subject to the setback requirements? if not, the language in the various sections should separate areas from structures and treat them accordingly. . Question/Comment: If we're going to refer to 'Uafty! standards, we need to clarify what department/division/group w/in the U has jurisdiction -- like Extension or whomever... Item E.2: LRT p1ar3 . Tust far the record, I've never been in favor of the version of LRT w/overhead electrlGal lines, l,f this ~ the only version under consideration, one of mY major objectives would b@ to minimize the number of residential