My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_05Feb22
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
PCAgenda_05Feb22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 9:14:16 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 8:37:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING <br />• The public hearing was opened by the Chair. Roger Miller, the property owner and <br />applicant came forward to speak and to answer any questions the Commission might have. <br />Commissioner Harris pointed out that mosquitoes are everywhere; why would the problem <br />be any worse at this property. Mr. Miller said that the site had been swamp, according to a <br />map from the 1920, and has a lot of high vegetation. This affects the whole Grove <br />neighborhood. <br />There being no one else who wanted to speak, the hearing was closed. <br />VARIANCE AT 2135 HOYT: DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION <br />Commissioner Ziebarth said that she had gone to look at the property. She did not feel that <br />the variance was unreasonable. <br />Commissioner Lukermann said she would move to recommend approval with a qualifying <br />statement that the project does not meet the hardship standard but that the homeowner has <br />sought and received the approval of everyone with a stake in the commons area. This and <br />the existence of the commons provide mitigating circumstances. Commissioner Heideman <br />seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Ryan agreed that there is not a qualifying hardship and felt that the other <br />• nonconforming properties are not relevant. His concern is the setting of a precedent. The <br />Commission should not feel bound by its decision tonight when it is asked to consider <br />similar applications from other property owners. He acknowledged the special <br />circumstances but believes we should abide by our code. If the encroachment was 10 feet <br />or more he would deny it absolutely. <br />Harris agreed with Ryan's concern but said she felt this variance was more justified than <br />the last one the Commission considered. Lukermann said this was the reason for the <br />stipulation in her motion. <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Lageson, Mr. Miller said the commons is <br />used almost as parkland. It is open to all, but each resident takes care of his/her own <br />portion. <br />There being no further discussion, the question was called. The motion passed <br />unanimously. The Council will consider the Commission's recommendation on December <br />8. <br />DISCUSSION OF STORAGE USE UNDER CITY ZONING CODE. <br />Staff Liaison Jones introduced a Staff report on this issue by emphasizing that this agenda <br />item is not a reconsideration of the TIES application in June but the result of interest that <br />• was generated at the time regarding storage as a use under zoning codes in general. The <br />Commission, TIES and members of the public had all requested more information. Staff <br />had requested information from other cities in the metro and did some internet research and <br />City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of November 23, 2004 -Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.