My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_05Aug23
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
PCAgenda_05Aug23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 9:12:58 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parking into the public right of way. Ms. Worthington said that action would require an <br />additional action by the Commission, a new publishing of notice and another public hearing. <br />Mr. Ryan reviewed the motion. The final version of the motion was to recommend approval <br />of the remaining four variances with the condition that 6 additional off-site, off-street parking <br />spaces be arranged by the property owner. The question was called and motion carried 4 to <br />3 (Heideman, Ryan and Lageson opposed). <br />Staff Liaison Jones reminded the audience that this matter goes to the City Council for a final <br />decision in August. <br />PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT REGARDING NON-CONFORMITY <br />Ms. Jones introduced Joel Jamnik from the City Attorney's office to address the <br />Commission's questions regarding a proposed amendment the the City Code concerning <br />nonconformities, tabled from the May meeting. Mr. Jamnik offered a brief statement of <br />background information on the proposed changes and explained the difference between the <br />old language and the new language. The new provision is more succinctly stated than the old <br />but essentially the same except for the addition of a rebuilding provision in the event of <br />destruction by fire. <br />In response to a question from Mr. Lageson, repeating a concern brought up by Commissioner <br />Harris in May, Mr. Jamnik said that final paragraph in Section 1 applies to both <br />subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the second paragraph, whichever one applies. In other words, if the <br />• nonconformity is discontinued or abandoned for more than a year, then the subsequent use or <br />occupancy must conform; also, if the property is destroyed by fire and the rebuild provisions <br />are not met, then the subsequent use or occupancy must conform. Mr. Jamnik commented <br />that City Attorney Roger Knutson's restatement of the concept is, in fact, "quite elegant." <br />Commissioner Lageson moved that the amendment be approved, Ms. Lukermann seconded. <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: <br />Mr. Lageson reminded the Commission and the audience that the Ice Cream Social is coming <br />up this Thursday. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:38 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />~~~ <br />Deborah Jo es, Staff Liaison <br />• <br />City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of June 27, 2005 -Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.