PCAgenda_05Nov29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In response to a question from Commissioner Harris, the applicant said that the new business would use the existing sign. They are thinking about additional signage on the new entry but nothing is planned yet. Matthew Martin of 1697 Hamline came to the podium to address the Commission. The Martins own the home immediately adjacent to the clinic on the north. Mr. Martin's first concern was that there not be any more big neon signs going up, as he already has to look at many illuminated business signs, such as SuperAmerica and Tires Plus. As for the proposed entry, he has no objection. Della Martin of 1697 Hamline also spoke to the Commission. Her concerns are hours of operation and adding to light pollution for nearby residents. She said that the present entry is awkward for clinic clients, and she doesn't see a problem with the proposed vestibule. She and her husband would prefer an entry that faces the street instead of the parking lot, because arear-facing entry would also face their home and have more of an impact on them. There being no other person who wished to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:42 p.m. DISCUSSION AND ACTION: Variance at 1372 Larpenteur In response to a question from Commissioner Ryan, City Attorney Mattick said that the variance would run with the property and that the current owner has also signed the variance application before the Commission. The Commissioners discussed the question of whether placing the entrance at the rear of the building (north, parking lot side) instead of on the east side as proposed, would really constitute a substantial • hardship for the owner and what the impact would be on the community, either way. The following points were made in the discussion: • The proposed entry makes good business sense • A rear entry would provide better service to clients • The above would not apply to clients arriving on foot or by alternate transportation • The Comprehensive Plan encourages business that face the community • The proposed addition is minimal, especially compared to the proposal for 1871 Larpenteur. • The Commission has applied tougher standards to other setback variances recently • It is not absolutely necessary to have the entrance on the east; there are other options such as the parking-lot (rear) entry and a vestibule inside the existing structure. • A rear facing entrance would have a greater impact on adjacent residents than aneast-facing entry. Tracy moved, Harris seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of the variance. Motion passed, S in favor and 2 opposed. The final decision will go to the City Council in October, most likely October 12. INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: • Staff Liaison Jones introduced Jane Fandrey, who will be serving the City as a planning intern this semester. Ms. Fandrey is a student at the University of Minnesota. City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of September 27, 2005 -Page 2 of 3