My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_04Aug24
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2004
>
PCAgenda_04Aug24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 9:05:56 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 9:20:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This property, while not unique, shazes the unusual lot-shape constraints mentioned in the first <br />pazagraph of this report with most properties in the blocks bounded by Snelling, Asbury, <br />Roselawn and Crawford. Denial of the variance will certainly impose an inconvenience; <br />• hardship is a subjective matter. Of the two alternate options discussed, one would be far more <br />costly to the owner and the other would require the loss of an important outdoor amenity. <br />h. Whether the variance is sought principally to increase financial gain to the owner of the <br />property, and to determine whether a substantial hardship to the owner would result <br />from a denial of the variance. <br />Staff finds that no material or financial gain will occur in the granting of this variance. Staff <br />does not find that a substantial hardship to the owner will result from denial of the variance, <br />because the owner has other options. <br />i. Whether the conditions which give rise to the application for the variance arose after the <br />adoption of this Chapter of the Code of the City of Falcon Heights or any amendment <br />thereto which placed the tract in a zoning district different from what it was under the <br />Chapter. In the consideration of this item, the City shall make diligent inquiry as to all <br />changes in the property and shall refuse to grant the variance if the problem is one that can <br />be solved through a proper application of a conditional use permit or an amendment of the <br />Zoning code. Financial hardship shall not be a basis for the granting of a variance when <br />the owner purchased the property in reliance on a promise that a variance would be <br />granted, and the City shall dismiss the appeal if it shall appear that the property was <br />purchased on such reliance. <br />• Not applicable. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff does not find sufficient reason to deny this variance and therefore recommends approval. <br />1. The impact of the addition on neighboring properties will be minor. To date no neighbor has <br />contacted the City to express disapproval of the proposal. <br />2. The addition of a master bedroom and bathroom is a reasonable amenity for a home in <br />Falcon Heights and will probably improve the value of the property. <br />3. The size and configuration of the house will not be out of line with other residences on <br />Asbury and East Snelling Drive, most of which are non-conforming, and several of which <br />have been granted variances for home additions. <br />Attachments• <br />Variance application (paid) <br />Site plans, existing and proposed <br />Floor plans, existing and proposed <br />Maps of the immediate neighborhood between Asbury and Snelling, for compazison <br />• <br />Falcon Heights Planning Commission August 24, 2004 Page 3 of 4 <br />Staff report on a lot coverage variance request at 1885 Asbury Street <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.