My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_03Feb25
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
PCAgenda_03Feb25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:52:55 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 9:39:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
must submit an amendment of the plan to the Metropolitan. The Planning Commission would <br />vote on a resolution to go to the City Council. <br />No member of the public wished to speak at this hearing. <br />CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Lukermann on zoning changes, Ms. Worthington <br />said that the zoning will change from the present B-3 to a Planned Unit Development with mixed <br />use, commercial and residential. The plan will be shared with the public at a community meeting <br />on February 20. <br />Commissioner Harris moved, Tracy seconded, that the Planning Commission recommend <br />approval of the resolution to the City Council. There being no discussion, the vote was taken and <br />the motion carried unanimously. <br />HEARING ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR AN <br />INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR A FARMER'S MARKET AT TWIN CITIES CO-OP <br />Ms. Worthington came forward again to present the background of this issue. In late 2002, the <br />city was approached by Twin Cities Co-op with the idea of holding a farmer's market, under the <br />sponsorship of the St. Paul Farmer's Markets, in its north parking lot. There was overwhelmingly <br />positive response at a community meeting for nearby residents on November 26, 2002, also on <br />the city-wide survey. There are three steps to the code amendment: (1) the addition of a <br />definition of a farmer's market, (2) the general provision for an Interim Use Permit, which is <br />• similar to a Conditional User Permit but more flexible, allowing reconsideration of a permit, (3) <br />the addition of a farmer's market as a legal interim use in the B-2 zone of the city. Copies of the <br />amendment had been sent to nearby residents with notice of this hearing. Staff Liaison Jones <br />reviewed several minor changes that had been made to the proposed amendment since the copies <br />were mailed out. <br />Richard Rajec of Maple Court expressed concern about the "money trail" of the farmer's market <br />and wanted to know who benefits from it. Ms. Worthington replied that the benefit is to the <br />community as an added amenity. No fee is being charged by TCC or by the City. She clarified <br />that the Horticultural Society was only involved in the November 26 meeting as a potential <br />vendor. Mr. Rajec said that obviously the Farmer's Market is benefiting. In his opinion the <br />produce at the Har Mar market was inferior, and he did not understand how the expected <br />customers would get in and out of the site without problems. If there is no benefit to the City, <br />there is no reason to have the market here. <br />The next speaker, Mr. Choong-Sihn Youn of Tatum Streets introduced himself as an architect who <br />deals with traffic studies. He presented to the Commission his study of traffic on Tatum and his <br />evaluation of traffic pressure and parking needs for the proposed market. He feels that the impact <br />of traffic on Tatum will be greater than expected and that the available parking at the site will be <br />inadequate. Mr. Youn felt that the market is not a good fit for the neighborhood and that the Co- <br />op gets the business benefit of all the traffic without doing any advertising. He proposed a one <br />year moratorium. <br />The Commissioners asked several questions about the information and assumptions upon which <br />Mr. Youn based his evaluation. Commissioner Maher asked for clarification on the revocation of <br />the permit. Mr. Knutson said that, unlike a conditional use permit, an interim use permit requires <br />an endpoint, either an end date or an event. In response to a question from Commissioner Tracy, <br />03_0204.doc Falcon Heights Planning Commission, February 4, 2003 Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.