PCAgenda_03May27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Anal,~sis: • a. That the granting of the variance(s) will not be detrimental to the public welfare. 1. Front setback: Staff finds that the granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare. 2. Lot coverage: Staff finds that the granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare. b. That the granting of the variance(s) will not substantially diminish or impair property values or improvements in the area. 1. Front setback: Staff finds that the granting of this variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values. 2. Lot coverage: Staff finds that the granting of this variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values. The proposed site plan represents an improvement over existing. c. That the granting of the variance(s) is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. Staff finds that the granting of these variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. Given that the restaurant and drive-through are permitted uses of this property, given the parking requirements for this type of business, and given the constraints placed on access and parking by the size of the property and the proximity of the Snelling/ • Larpenteur intersection, the letter of the code represents a substantial impediment to the establishment of this permitted business without some degree of variance. d. That the variances(s) will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 1. Front setback: Staff finds that the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties at 1546 Crawford Avenue and at Falcon Crossing. 2. Lot coverage: Staff finds that the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent properties at 1546 Crawford Avenue and at Falcon Crossing. e. That the variance(s) will not impair the orderly use of the public streets; 1. Front setback: Staff finds that the variance will not impair the orderly use of the public streets. 2. Lot coverage: Staff finds that the variance will not impair the orderly use of the public streets. f. That the variance(s) will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety; 1. Front setback: Staff finds that the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. 2. Lot coverage: Staff finds that the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. g. Whether the shape, topographical condition or other similar characteristic of the tract is such as to distinguish it substantially from all of the other properties in the zoning district of Staff Report: Dino's Restaurant May 23, 2003 Page 2 of 4