My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_07Jan23
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2007
>
PCAgenda_07Jan23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 9:27:10 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 10:33:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioners had some additional questions and concerns to be passed on to the Council. <br />• • Is a separate ordinance needed for commercial properties? <br />• Does the ordinance under consideration allow for large construction projects? <br />• Is the language on security too vague? <br />• Is the size limit in Section 2 reasonable by industry standards, for both residential and <br />non-residential property? <br />In the discussion Commissioners gave careful consideration to the amount of regulation that <br />would be in the best interests of both the city and residents and how specific that should be in <br />the ordinance. Careful thought was also given to safety and security considerations and to <br />possible unforeseen circumstances that might complicate enforcement of the ordinance. <br />Commissioner Lukermann moved, Mercer-Taylor seconded, that the Commission recommend <br />approval of the proposed ordinance as amended above, provided the City Attorney and <br />Council address the concerns and questions posed by the Commission. The motion passed <br />with 5 in favor and 1 opposed. <br />INFORMATION AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: <br />Mr. Lageson asked for an update on recodification. Ms. Jones said Dtaff is putting the <br />finishing touches on the master copy to be sent to the recodification company. The draft has <br />been reviewed by "many eyes" and marked up by "many hands." It willl be sent off within <br />days, and the final copy should be delivered by the end of the year. She reminded the <br />• Commission that the new code is, as always, a "work in progress" and subject to change. <br />Ms. Mercer-Taylor reminded the Commission of the invitation to join the Comprehensive <br />Plan Steering Committee at its meeting on December 11. In response to a question from Mr. <br />Rodich, Ms. Jones reviewed the formal role in the approval of the new comprehensive plan. <br />This is different from the steering committee's information gathering role. Mr. Lageson asked <br />what happens if the University sells some of its land in the City. Jones replied that underlying <br />zoning is already in place on University and State Fair land. Presently that zoning is R-1. One <br />of the things that might happen in the new comprehensive plan is that the City might reassess <br />that underlying zoning, but at this time the University has no plans to sell that land. <br />On behalf of the City staff, Ms. Jones expressed thanks to the members of the Planning <br />Commission for their hard work in the past year, especially the members who are leaving the <br />Commission after serving two terms: Jim DeLeo, Tom Lageson, Pat Ryan and Michael Tracy. <br />On behalf of the remaining Commissioners, Ms. Lukermann expressed appreciation to the <br />members whose terms are expiring. <br />ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />• Deborah Jones, Staff Liaison <br />City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of November 28, 2006 -Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.