Laserfiche WebLink
• Background <br />Purpose and Scope <br />Because Falcon Heights is part of the seven-county Metropolitan Area, it is required to <br />update its Comprehensive Plan every ten years in accordance with the Mandatory Land <br />Planning Act of 1976. This is the third generation plan to be completed by the City since <br />enactment. The last major update of the Falcon Heights Comprehensive Plan was <br />completed in 1991; a revision was submitted in 2000. <br />The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to guide the City in all of its decisions relating <br />to land use, transportation, community facilities, public improvements/investments and <br />intergovernmental relations. It is a body of public policy that defines and promulgates a <br />vision for the future, a vision that will be realized only if public policy is consistently and <br />universally applied. <br />The Comprehensive Plan is a general statement of policy that can be interpreted rather <br />broadly. If too loosely interpreted, it loses its value and is subject to legal challenge. It is <br />dynamic and multidimensional establishing concepts, principals, relationships, patterns <br />and sequencing, while zoning, with which it is frequently confused, is specific, legal, <br />rigid, contemporary acid static. Zoning is merely one of many tools available to <br />implement the City's plans. <br />• This plan was prepared in consultation with the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee <br />in concert with the Planning Commission and City Council and with assistance from City <br />Staff and Consultants. By statute, the Planning Commission is charged with evaluating all <br />public and private land use, transportation, community facilities and investment proposals <br />to determine their consistency with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives and <br />policies. If proposals do not adhere to planning principals as embodied in the adopted <br />Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission may either recommend denial or <br />consider amending its plan. If it considers an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the <br />burden of proof must fall to the proposer to demonstrate that the amendment will not be <br />detrimental to the City, the neighborhood or the environment and will not substantially <br />increase the need for publicly financed improvements. <br />Perhaps the one thing that needs most to be remembered is that no decision can be made <br />independently of all others. Since the plan theoretically establishes an optimal balance <br />between land use intensities, street capacities and other natural and cultural systems, an <br />amendment may be far more complex than maybe immediately apparent. These are the <br />challenges that accrue to a dynamic community and its Planning Commission. <br />• <br />Assembled Elements, Draft 1 FH Comp Plan 2007 Page 3 of 42 <br />