Laserfiche WebLink
• SIKKINK'S SEVEN MOTION SYST <br />EM <br />General Rules for a Sim lifted S stem of Parliamenta Procedure <br />The purpose of this decision making system is to allow efficient decision making that <br />represents a majority position. Any motion, request, discussion or proposal, which seems <br />to have as its purpose unreasonable delay, manipulation, or the goal of serving individual <br />ends rather than group ends, can be ruled out of order by the chair. Such a ruling by the <br />chair will be subject to the motion called appeal. <br />2• Free and open discussions are valued in this decision making system. For that reason, <br />most motions are discussable and the motion to restrict discussion requires a 2/3 vote in <br />order to pass. In recognizing persons for discussion, the chair first recognizes the person <br />who made the motion, next recognizes other persons and always recognizes a person who <br />has not spoken over a person who has already participated in the discussion. As far as <br />possible, the chair should try to alternately recognize persons representing different <br />viewpoints. <br />3• In examining the chart on the following page, you will note that five of the seven motions <br />are amendable. However, only one amendment at a time may be considered. As soon as <br />that amendment is passed or defeated, another amendment may be proposed. <br />4• The number in front of the motion listed indicates the rank of each motion. Thus, <br />#1 -General motions are lowest in rank, and #7 -Restrict Debate motions are highest in <br />rank. Two rules apply: <br />(1) You usually cannot consider two motions of the same rank at the same time, and <br />(2) If a motion of one rank is being considered, a motion of the same rank or lower <br />rank is usually out of order, but a motion of higher rank is in order. <br />While these rules generally apply, the chair may allow some flexibility in certain <br />circumstances. These situations almost always occur with motions #5, 6 and 7. For <br />example, if #7 - "Restrict Discussion" is being discussed and a member wants a secret <br />ballot vote on the matter, Re uest, while lower in rank, could be used to accomplish this <br />purpose. The chair is allowed to make all decisions on exceptions, but all such decisions <br />are subject to appeal. <br />