PCAgenda_08Apr22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

University land. She moved that the commission recommend the addition of this requirement to the Housing portion of the Implementation section of the plan (Section IV, page 14). The motion received a second. A lengthy discussion ensued. Generally, commissioners expressed agreement with the intent of Commissioner Lukermanri s motion. Several commissioners had questions or reservations about adding such specific language. Some felt that the existing draft language goes far enough because the comprehensive plan is intended to be a goal oriented document, that the draft already makes a general commitment to affordable housing in several places, and that this would be better addressed in the zoning code. Others felt that leaving it to future zoning changes is too passive an approach and that market forces might end up working against affordable housing unless this commitment is made in the comprehensive plan. When asked by the commission to give some input on the issue, City Attorney Jamnik said that this area of the law is somewhat "in flux" at present. There is disagreement about the extent of a city's authority to require as a condition of development the inclusion of low and moderate income housing. Although at least one local city has passed such an ordinance it has not been tested in court. He would advise against a "hard and fast statement" in the comprehensive plan. In response to a question from Commissioner Noble, Jones emphasized that the draft • comprehensive plan assumes that there is no intent on the part of the University to sell any of its land in Falcon Heights or private development. One implementation provision included in this plan is the removal of dual zoning from the public land so that the comprehensive plan would have to be amended if the public institutions ever sell their land. This gives the city more leverage if it ever does happen. The question was called. By a show of hands the motion was defeated, 3 in favor, 4 opposed. Commissioner Rodich proposed a new motion to echo the intent of Lukermanri s motion by adding a more "broad stroke' affordable housing statement in the vision and values portion of the plan. Commissioner Anderson pointed out that affordable housing is not a value but a means to an end, that end being a community that is economically and culturally diverse. Ms. Lukermann added that an important part of being a livable community is to provide housing that enables people to live near where they work - in particular University employees. Jones suggested incorporating these goals into the of the values statements: "Maintaining our traditional neighborhoods in this central Metro location, with opportunities for all our generations to stay in the city." Rodich accepted this suggestion and restated his motion, which was seconded by Salzberg. The motion passed unanimously. • The Chair asked for any further comments before a final motion. Anderson ointed P out that the page numbering does not match the document sections after Section IV. City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of March 25, 2008 -Page 2 of 3