My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_08May27
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
PCAgenda_08May27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 9:41:53 AM
Creation date
7/8/2009 12:17:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
couldn't have been properly permitted if the land was not supposed to be part of the <br />• adjoining lots. He said the lack of a permit should be investigated. What would <br />happen if the fence was not at the half way point? <br />Mr. Florian Lauer, 1736 Tatum, was the next speaker. He cited an earlier walkway <br />vacation further north on Tatum. <br />There being no one else who wished to speak, the hearing was closed. <br />DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION: <br />The commissioners began their discussion with a request to city attorney Jamnik for <br />his advice. Mr. Jamnik informed the commissioners that the sole purpose of their <br />present discussion was to make a recommendation to the City Council as to whether <br />the City has any interest in retaining ownership of Walk 4. Beyond that the fence and <br />location of the property line becomes a private property matter. The commission's <br />sole focus is the public interest. <br />In view of that recommendation, Commissioner Lukermann moved for the purpose <br />of discussion that the Commission find that there is no further public interest in Walk <br />4. After some additional discussion, the motion passed unanimously. The matter <br />• will now go to the City Council. <br />CITY COUNCIL MORATORIUM ON PERMITS FOR CERTAIN SIGNS <br />Staff Liaison Jones provided an introduction to Commissioners and the viewing <br />audience. On March 12, the City Council passed an interim ordinance temporarily <br />prohibiting the issuance of permits for certain kinds of signs using new technology, <br />including dynamic display designs and electronic graphic display signs and other <br />similar signs. The Planning Commission has been directed to study the issue and <br />come up with a recommendation for the City Council before the moratorium expires <br />on September 10. Jones out fined the expected timetable and said that two public <br />comment sessions have been scheduled for the May and June meetings of the <br />Planning Commission. Tonight is an introduction to the issue and an opportunity for <br />commissioners to ask questions of the city attorney and staff. <br />Commissioner Rodich asked if any present signs in the city fall into the categories <br />covered by the moratorium. Jones said that the only changeable sign is a time and <br />temperature strip at the credit union building, but that sign is being rebuilt and may <br />to include that display in the future. Also, the two service station signs change the <br />• prices, but these signs are not considered to be in the categories covered in the <br />moratorium. <br />City of Falcon Heights -Planning Commission Meeting of Apri122, 2008 -Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.