Laserfiche WebLink
pa9s 2 <br /> section 6.1i in section 9,1 it is stated ..that allfoods,,shall <br /> be from sources approved the Health Authority. Yet in 6.1 <br /> is says that the health authority may inspect food establishments <br /> outside the city.. Would. the approval of:.ell Food wholesalers <br /> who sail within .the city be granted as a matter of course, or- <br /> .would the approval be delegated to their'local administration, <br /> or do you anticipate inspecting the;-ma~-y~°wholesalers whn do <br /> business..in the City? <br /> Section 9.1: by prohibiting Mome psepered foods from being <br /> sold in s food establishment,-baaed.on, I asstnae, th® asawnption <br /> that home prepared foods coming from anon-regulated. source <br /> may be more prone to contamination:. and then allowing <br /> these se~me presumptively coneaminated foods.. to be used <br /> in schools and houses_of worship-seems-;tq deny..an equal <br /> pratectian'und~rac`the law to t.hase who eat in these two <br /> excluded establishments, <br /> section 10,1 th~..storag~ requirements as urritten, nd if` <br /> required of certain drugs, would cause them to spo 1, <br /> section 27,3, ellous for plan review, but i find o <br /> provision far anirv3pectitm prior to opening for an <br /> new. establishment, A pr~pvision which could save a lot <br /> of. trouble, <br /> Thera are other areas which, if the fooddefiRitio <br />retained. would be rediculously applied to the medi is <br />al <br /> :businesses in the City. <br /> One of my concerns, is why this resolutioh was nee ed. -The <br /> restaurants in the City are annually inspected by ©mpetant <br /> inspectors of the Board of Health; the last time w s frt <br /> ....April and I~ay of this year. If .there is a problem with <br /> a particular business they mske more frequent insp ctions. <br /> I know from past experience that these inspections are detailed <br /> end quite possibly moss .exacting than those done b .....other , <br /> units•~sThersfore I believe this resolution to be edundant <br />- and heref`ore an unnecessary imposition by governor nt aid <br /> an unwarranted .expenditure of taxpayer monies. <br /> Also I am sure that you ~ra.eware that this resolu ion purporting" <br /> to having the force & effect of law was not promul sited <br /> in accordance with the administrativeprocedures a t nf.the <br /> state of Minnesota and therefore does not have the force <br /> `.and effect of law. It should be either passed as n <br /> ordinance of the city, or reconsidered if possible and,re,~acted,: <br /> 3 would appreciate talking with you or any other c until members <br /> about this sub,~ect at any time. <br />i cerely yours /~ <br />_ _ Q//l : <br />Lowell 0, Anderson <br />~ . <br />