My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCRes_01-16
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
200x
>
2001
>
CCRes_01-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 10:40:28 AM
Creation date
7/13/2009 11:04:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No. 01-16 <br />• <br />City of Falcon Heights <br />City Council Resolution <br />Date: July 2 ~ 2001 <br />• <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 1720 ST. MARY'S STREET, DANIEL AND <br />ELIZABETH BROWNING <br />On July 26,.2001, the Falcon Heights City Council granted the following variance request 1720 St. <br />Mary's Street, owned by Daniel and Elizabeth Browning. <br />Chapter 9-2.06, subd. f(4) of the zoning code, in an R-1 zoning district. <br />A variance of two feet to allow the construction of an eight-foot high privacy fence along the rear lot Iine <br />of the property (as outlined in the attached diagram). <br />The City Council adopted the following findings for granting the variance at 1720 St. Mary's Street, <br />Falcon Heights: <br />a. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare; <br />b. That the granting of the variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values or <br />improvements in the area; <br />c. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights; <br />d. That the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. <br />e. That the amended variance will not impair the orderly use of the public streets; <br />f. That the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety; <br />g. That a particular hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience to the owner, would result if the <br />strict letter of the chapter were carried out. <br />h. That the variance is not sought principally to increase financial gain of the owner of the property and <br />that a substantial hardship to the owner would result from a denial of the variance. <br />Moved by: <br />Gehrz <br />Kuettel <br />Lamb <br />Lindstrom <br />Talbot <br />Kuettel <br />5 In Favor <br />Q_Against <br />Approved by: ~ . <br />Mayor <br />July 2T O1 <br />Da e <br />Attested by: , <br />City Clerk <br />July 2~~. 2001 <br />Date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.