My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCRes_02-21
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
200x
>
2002
>
CCRes_02-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 1:32:19 PM
Creation date
7/13/2009 11:36:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />No. 02-21 <br />City of Falcon Heights <br />City Council Resolution <br />Date: December 18, 2002 <br />Resolution APPROVING a Variance for 2190 Folwell Avenue <br />On December 18, 2002, the Falcon Heights City Council approved the following variance request for <br />2190 Folwell Avenue, legally known as Lot 1 and the north 46 feet of Lot 2, except the east 40 feet of <br />both lots, Auditors Subdivision No. 71: <br />Chapter 9-4.01, subdivision 4 (c) of the zoning code, in an R-1 zoning district: <br />A variance of 15 feet, to allow the construction of an addition to the south side of the existing home, <br />where a minimum of 30 feet is required in the zoning code. <br />The City Council adopted the following findings for granting the variance at 2190 Folwell Avenue: <br />a. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare; <br />• b. That the granting of the variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values or <br />improvements in the area; <br />c. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights; <br />d. That the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. <br />e. That the variance will not impair the orderly use of the public streets; <br />£ That the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety; <br />g. That a particular hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience to the owner, would result if the <br />strict letter of the chapter were carried out. <br />h. That the variance is not sought principally to increase financial gain of the owner of the property, but <br />that a substantial hardship to the owner would result from a denial of the variance. <br />Moved by: Kuettel <br />Gehrz 5 In Favor <br />Kuettel <br />Lamb 0 Against <br />Lindstrom <br />Talbot <br />Approved by: <br />Mayor <br />December 18. 2002 <br />Date <br />Attested by: <br />City Clerk <br />December 18, 2002 <br />Date <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.