Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Miss Carol Kriegler <br />Director, Parks and Recreation <br />City of Falcon Heights <br />2044 W. Larpenteur <br />Falcon Heights, MN 55113 <br />Dear Ms. Kriegler, <br />1666 Coffman, #132 <br />Falcon Heights, MN 55108 <br />May 25, 1993 <br />You and your staff. are to be complimented for an excellent presentation on the <br />proposed changes in Grove Park. It was a good forum for those who will be <br />impacted by the park to present their views. <br />One of your staff asked me how. many homes at 1666 would be affected by park <br />lighting. As you know the building is H-shaped. There would be six homes <br />on the southwest end of the building nearest the park. We live on the inner <br />courtyard side of the southeast wing which encompasses 9 homes. That gives <br />a total of 15 directly affected by any light-spill. I have been particularly <br />vocal as the brilliant orange lens of that inappropriate high-intensity light <br />is truly baleful. However, I am comforted by your assurances that you will <br />keep this in mind in selecting park lighting. <br />I served for five years on the Lauderdale City Council during a time when we <br />improved our city park at Roselawn and Fulham. Improved picnic tables, grills, <br />and lighting provided a perfect atmosphere for the gathering of young people <br />spring, summer and fall to the distress of bordering homeowners. It is my <br />thought that the construction of a gazebo with the mentioned "security Qighting" <br />will prove toq~he same headache. A Grove homeowner at the south end of the park <br />did make this comment. I support the comments of another Grove owner who <br />favored a take-down shelter for winter skating. I think you would find this <br />most satisfactory in the long run. I speak from experience when I say that <br />Lauderdale had many, many difficult times over beer parties and late night <br />gatherings in our "improved park." The city was forced to have regular police <br />patrols to keep it within acceptable bounds. <br />Another item for your consideration is the proposed pathway to intersect 1666 <br />Coffman's service road. There were some concerns offered, but I do not recall <br />any concrete acceptance. To use our service lane as a connection back to Coffman <br />St. from a hard-surfaced pathway would most assuredly invite roller-bladers, <br />s~$~boarders, bicyclists, and even pedestrians on to our property. Such usage <br />o ,~ ard-surfaced drive and very large patio (already used by children on bicycles), <br />even though innocently, would put our association at risk fora liability lawsuit <br />in case of injury.. Our Board of Directors has not had the opportunity to think <br />this possibility through, and they certainly should before implemention of a <br />pathway with a direct connection through the park to our service drive. <br />cc: Marcia Sundquist <br />Norma Olson <br />Harald Jensen <br />Maynard Reynolds, <br />Assoc. President <br />`.S~ 1 y ~ a2~ <br />Q~l <br />~~ ane Lindberg <br />~~ .~, <br />