Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />PliBLIC HEARING, July 23, 1980 <br />PROPOSED UPDATING QF COMPREHIsNSIVIs h1UNIC1_f'~tiL PLAN o1 <br />Falcon Heights, Minncsoti <br />~s P.equired by Provisions of the Metr_opol_itan Land Planning Act <br />~ SliMT~iARY OF FINDINGS, Ct)NCT,[JSIONS AND R} COMMF.NUATIONS <br />Background <br />iti'hile formal Community planning efforts date back to at least 19!+9, <br />Falcon Heights does not now have an up-to-date comprehensive plan for <br />future development nor environmental maintenance. This current plan- <br />ning effort is intended to bring Local planning up-to-date and aise t, <br />comply with legal_ rec{uirement.s for tucal community planning; and ac~~~~a. <br /><.nother purpose of this planning effort is an attempt to arrive at a <br />consensus as to environmental_ needs for the future. In short, an at- <br />tempt to describe what Falcon Heights should be like yin future years. <br />s an aid to this process, two citizen surveys were conducted to h-~ln <br />list the likes, dislikes with respect to the Community environmer.`~ anc'_ <br />to obtain comments and suggestions for improvement over the coming ~:2ars. <br />hork on the proposed City Plan has been conducted by the. Planning Com- <br />mission over the past two years with assistance from a Planning Consultant <br />Summar~° of Findings and Conclusions <br />Falcon Heights has some unique features including a highlZ~ di~~rersi~ied <br />population, major land areas in l~ub tic ~is~, (U, of M. and State Fair~~~ , <br />residential areas in generally excc~ lent condition in sharp contrast <br />- to commercial area deterioration, and rl "rural" atmoshert~ in an urba:. <br />setting. Other significant bindings are: <br />1. 'There are negative en vi.ron.menta.l. fa~~tors whi_cli could lead to h_,usi:,g <br />deterioration in the f-utur_e.. <br />2. Population numbers have been rather stable in Falcon Heights since <br />1960; preliminary 1980 Census data i.n<lic.ates a current population <br />of only about 5,200 persons which is also the 'Metropolitan Council <br />projection for population in the. year 2000. It is essential t't~at <br />the City takes steps to assure a ftit~irc: population of over 5,000 <br />persons to remain in a sound public fl.nancial condition. I°funicipai <br />State Aid and other f.nanc.ial grants-in-a:id will be lost if popula- <br />tion drops below the 5,000 person marls. <br />3. The Universitti wil_1. maintain the currant use of the various farms. <br />land plots within the foreseeable future thus assuring a continues <br />"open, green space" atmosphere. 'I'bis does mean, however, that on 1-: <br />about 24 acres of private, vacant land remains for residential_ and <br />other developments (approx. 7 commer~~ial acres and 1] residentl~i~. <br />4. Zoning regulations and certain other codes and ordinances are not <br />up-to-date, in total. compllanc.e, with new State requirements, nor <br />adequate for current environmenta:L protection and improvement needs. <br />5. While existing land use patterns anti traffic. circulation feat~.~re <br />are far from ideal, improvements can be mz.de to the living environment. <br />_, 6. Provisions for pedestrian and bike circulation arc, for the most part, <br />inadequate and even hazardous _n some areas. <br />7. Detailed and localizc,d im rovements can be made to the environment <br />P <br />that will give the Community a greater sense of identity, help main- <br />-1- <br />_. <br />