My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCMin_80Nov3
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
PCMin_80Nov3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 3:59:07 PM
Creation date
7/16/2009 3:56:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 3, 1980 <br />• The Regular Planning Commission Meeting for the month of November was called <br />to order by Chairman Les Larsen at 7:30 p.m. November 3, 1980. Present were <br />Al Stefanson, Erma Olson, Jerry Wallin, Mike Heffron, Bob Blomberg, Harold <br />Nilsen and Jim Bourquin. Also present was Council Liaison Sandy Larson. <br />Absent was Elving Anderson. <br />The first item of business was the application of W. Pipkorn, 1757 N. Hamline, <br />for a permit to construct a 20' by 20' garage on pre-existing foundations on <br />his property. The garage was previously destroyed by fire leaving the footings <br />intact. Bob Blomberg had visited the site and was of the opinion that the foot- <br />ings appeared to be in good shape. Upon a motion by Mike Heffron and seconded <br />by Erma Olson it was recommended that the Council grant the building and use <br />permit upon the condition that a permission letter from the affected neighbor <br />be obtained and presented. The motion was unanimously carried. <br />The next item of business was regarding the pool ordinance. All swimming pool <br />owners in the City had been notified of the meeting. Sandy Larson advised the <br />Commission that the ordinance that was passed already contained the language <br />which might have a retroactive effect. Erma Olson spoke on the ordinance in <br />the capacity of a pool owner. She would be highly upset if the fencing height <br />were changed and made applicable to existing pools by virtue of the new ordi- <br />nance so as to require a 6 foot high fence. At the time she built her pool <br />several years ago she fought with the City for over a year to get approval <br />for a 5 foot fence when 22 feet was the height limit. City Attorney Kenefick <br />indicated that the intent of the pool ordinance was to require 6 foot fences on <br />prospective new pools and similarly on existing pools with no fences at all. <br />• Jim Bourquin was generally in support of the fencing requirement. Carl Dale <br />was of the opinion that 5 feet was adequate, but it should be around the pool <br />rather than around the property line. Al Stefanson was of the opinion that <br />all pools should conform to the ordinance. Suggestions were made that the <br />pool fence height requirement be established at 5 feet. Sandy Larson said she <br />would take the Commission's comments to the next Council Meeting. <br />Sandy Larson advised the Commission of certain decisions recently made by the <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the intersection of Crawford <br />and Snelling. Apparently that intersection has more vehicular accidents than <br />the Snelling - Larpenteur intersection. The State will barricade the median <br />to prevent crossing Snelling at Crawford. Access from the east side of Snelling <br />on to Crawford will remain so that vehicles may turn right and go north on <br />Snelling from Crawford. She also advised that the State is planning to barricade <br />the Larpenteur entrance to the Flower City parking area. This is expected to be <br />done by 1982 and it is anticipated that the State will pick up at least 75% of <br />the cost. <br />Sandy also advised that the Board of County Commissioners has approved the <br />establishment of stop signs at Cleveland and Roselawn as well as Hamline and <br />Roselawn so as to make those intersections four way stops from the present two <br />way stop. This is for the purpose of conducting a two year trial period. <br />Sandy further advised that the current effort to vacate the walk way that was <br />discussed at recent Council Meetings has met with a problem. There is some <br />• reference in the abstracts of title so as to create problems if the vacating <br />goes as originally planned. John Kenefick is looking into this problem. <br />Carl Dale discussed the comments contained in the University of Minnesota's <br />letter dated October 16, 1980 concerning our Comprehensive Plan. He felt that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.