PCMin_82Feb1_Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEFTING~PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 1, 1982 PAGE 5 • Jack Anderson, Traffic Engineer, explained the proposed traffic offsets at intersections. He did not see any problem with traffic at Larpenteur and Prior. Al Stefanson compared traffic counts on Garden Avenue (near his home) to Tatum, the traffic on Garden being considerably more than that on Tatum which he felt did not cause a problem for those in his neighborhood. JACK ANDERSON TRAFFIC ENGINEER John Kiel, 1812 Tatum, inquired as to whether or not American Shelter JOHN. KIEL had, in good faith, approached the University for a street to Cleveland 182 TATUM and was assured that the Mayor, Councilmember Eggert and the Clerk Administrator had meet with representatives of the University and that the matter was being presented to the Board of Regents. Jerry ~"~allin asked PJ[r. Stowe if he felt the citizens group was deprived in that they did not have ten days to review the plan and if they would like additional time. ~'tr. Stowe replied in the affirmative. Nir. Zti'allin felt the group should have that opportunity, even though, he personally, approved of the plan. He suggested the matter be tabled until the residents have an opportunity to check the matter further. Harold Nilsen stated, that in reading Ordinance #138, he understands Section 17.6 to require the plan to be approved first, then the re- • zoning would be considered. In view of this information, he felt the Public Hearing is not in order, and the Commission should be considering the plan, approve, deny, or changes if information is not adequate. He was of the opinion that the meeting should be continued to a later date since they had put the "cart before the horse". Jerry Wallin was of the opinion that the information presented at this meeting is what the Commission should have had long ago and agreed with Mr. Nilsen. JERRY WALLIN HAROLD NILSEN Erma Olson moved that the Planning Commission approve the preliminary MOTION TO plans and grant the request to rezone to ?'UD from R-1 and B-lA as REZONE recommended by the Planner and City Engineer. The motion was seconded by Mary Waldo. John Labalestra stated he was in favor of the PUD but had many concerns, JOHN the developer should request participation by the residents to find out LABALESTRA what type of development they prefer, and the possibility that the sewer could be proven inadequate which could be costly to the community. He objected to the proposed plan. Engineer Lemberg explained that the sanitary sewer was designed for BRAD LEMBERG development of the area as it is presently zoned and the proposed development of this property would result in the same density as the