PCMin_82Mar1_Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- on Tatum Street. He feels that with winter driving conditions, Tatum Street could not handle any more traffic exiting onto Larpenteur. If there is an ingress egress t o Cleveland, it would be more favorable for the project, and, therefore, he supports the Resolution. Don Mead is in favor of the Resolution if the traffic situation is resolved where there is no more traffic on Tatum Street. Mary Waldo questions when the traffic light on Prior would be installed. John Labalestra feels that since the Hewlett Packard development and the future development of the PUD project, it would be forthcoming within a short period. Emma Olson pointed out that Larpenteur Manor has 1!~!~ units with only one exit entrance and there does not seem to be a traffic problem onto Larpenteur whereas the proposed PUD project has 200 units. Since the Resolution brovides for an emergency exit and another possible exit, she is in favor of the Resolution. Following the discussion, the following voted in favor of the foregoing motion: Olson, Nilsen, Blomberg, Labalestra, Stefanson, Mead and V4~aldo, and voting against the same: Wallin. Motion carried to adopt the Resolution. Chairman Stefanson proceeded with the hearing advising the same foremat would be followed as in previous public hearings. He also pointed out • a change in the zoning--Ordinance #163 amended Ordinance #64, which should have been zoned R-1 on the Hawkins-Hermes property. There is no affect on the POD. Harold Westin did not have any objection to the P-5 Plan or to the Resolution, and will address questions asked after the Neighborhood Task Force presentations. Planner Carl Dale indicated that the safety factor of routing all the traffic to Larpenteur is satisfactory provided in the plan that Prior is left open only for emergency vehicles and that the easement also state that it can be used also for a general emergency such as accidents on Larpenteur~Prior, water pipes that might burst, utility work, etc. so that the street could be opened for a couple of hours to accommodate the neighborhood if regulated by the fire police department. Engineer Lemberg referred to the in-debth study that was requested on the utilities for the area under question. He has done a study of the sanitary sewer all the way to St. Marys and has found that the capacity of the existing sanitary sewer is more than adequate for the development. A more detailed report is contained in his February 25, 1982 letter to the Planning Commission. The waste water flows were examined and if the system is properly designed with the necessary percolation vaults or areas, the holding pond areas .and volumes are in proper retrospect with the plan that was done in 1971 and with the recent updating. He strongly DON MEAD MARY 1NALD0 EMMA OLSON AL STEFANSON HAROLD WESTIN, HAROLD WESTIN AND ASSOC. CARL DALE CITY PLANNER BRAD LEMBERG, CITY ENGINEER recommends that if the project were the proceed, that the water main on