Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MARCH 21, 1983 <br />PAGE 3 <br />i Al Stefanson asked if copies of their finariicial statements could be made AL STEFANSON/ <br />available. James Maenner advised that the First National Bank's accountants GOOD VALUE <br />had thoroughly reviewed Good Value Homes f financial statements and found HOMES <br />them in good order. Good Value Homes will provide any financial statements <br />requested by the City. <br />Al Stefanson also asked about tree retention. Good Value Homes advised AL STEFANSON/ <br />that every effort will be made to save as many trees as possible. Some GOOD VALUE <br />trees will be put in baskets and taken off site and some will be later re- HOMES <br />located back on the site. They feel that trees are a value to the neighbor- <br />hood. Trees located along the edge of the property lines will be saved. <br />Harold Nilsen asked where the utilities would be located on the lots and <br />Good Value Homes stated that the utilities would be placed underground HAROLD IVILSEN/ <br />in the boulevard area. Nilsen felt the boulevards should be free of trees. GOOD VALUE <br />He also asked if the utilities would. be assessed against the property HOMES <br />owners and Good Value Homes replied that they would, <br />Discussions on traffic flow to the north and south were again considered. <br />Good Value Homes again stated that if an access were made to the south HAROLD NILSEN/ <br />it would not be the best use of the land. Harold Nilsen stated that the GOOD V.4L UE <br />traffic on Tatum servicing 11l~ homes located in the area is not excessive HOMES <br />and felt it would not be a problem for this development. An extensive <br />traffic study was previously compiled which also indicated that traffic <br />would not be excessive. <br />• Paul Ciernia questioned whether the construction equipment could be braught <br />in from the south and Good Value Homes replied that it could but the PAUL CIERNIA/ <br />building materials would probably need to be brought in from the north. GOOD VAL UE HOME; <br />George Plant, 1861 Moore, wondered if the ponding was adequate for storm GEORGE PLANT <br />water flow and Good Value Homes assured him that the ponding would be 1861 MOORE <br />adequate to handle the storm water flow from all directions. <br />Martin McCleary, 1918 Autumn, felt the development blended quite nicely PdARTIN <br />with the existing neighborhood but is concerned about the access and McCLEERY, <br />wonders if the Planning Commission has given consideration to an access 1918 AUTUMN <br />to the south and hopes there will be more discussion regarding this. <br />Good Value Homes assured Mr. McCleary that all access routes were given GOOD VALUE <br />consideration--the access to the east was eliminated because a home would HOMES <br />be needed to be taken; access to the south would add traffic and would <br />be damaging to the developer; and access to the west would be provided <br />for a one year period of time. They feel the present preliminary plan <br />provides for adequate traffic flow. <br />Don Mead wondered if an access to Cleveland is a good alternative since the <br />street is narrow, it is heavily travelled and left turns could be dangerous DON MEAD/ <br />because a traffic light could not probably be 3ustified. Good Value Homes GOOD VALUE <br />agreed that traffic counts would not probably make it feasibl®. HOMES <br /> <br />