Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING/PUHLIC HEARING <br />NovEMaER 5, 1981 <br />PAGE 2 <br />• Mike Labalestra informed the Planning Commission that the Lido Cafe had <br />entered into a purchase agreement for a contract for deed fora ten year <br />period with the Crofts. He requested that the property be rezoned from <br />R-1 to B-2 since the Lido Cafe is proposing an addition consisting of a <br />green house lounge including food service and a deli operation. Plans <br />also include a small banquet room in the basement. They need the Croft <br />property rezoned for use as additional parking. Mr. Labalestra advised <br />that the expansion approval is crucial since their present building can only <br />do so much and the present restaurant is at capacity since only so many <br />dollars can be generated. It is a matter of survival and a good return on <br />their investment. <br />MIKE <br />LABALESTRA <br />LIDO <br />John Labalestra then reviewed in great detail a parking analysis fact sheet JOHN <br />showing their existing parking and parking needed in three different plans. LABALESTRA <br />He advised that he felt expansion of the restaurant was-five years behind . <br />The expansion is needed in order to compete in the business world. They have <br />considered moving the restaurant elsewhere but prefer to remain in the City of <br />Falcon Heights. They do not want to disturb the neighborhood. He felt the <br />Lido to be a family tradition of high quality food, no use of convenience food, <br />hiring quality people but the restaurant competition is intens®. The addition <br />would add 3,500 square feet with a 600 square foot banquet room in the basement. <br />Parking has been designed to use alley way and not use St. Marys Street. There <br />will be a ten foot buffer between the parking lot and the residential neighborhood <br />with the buffer to consist of fencing, berming and trees- whatever it takes to <br />provide the best screening. There will be a 17 foot buffer on the west. The <br />. alley way is presently private property owned by the Hermes and the Labalestras <br />have done everything they could to work with the Hermes to negotiate an <br />agreement to use the alley but an agreement has not been reached at this time. <br />John Uban, City Planner, stated he had not seen aqy detailed plans but felt JOHN UHAN <br />critical issues have not been solved. The other parking options have not been CITY <br />thoroughly explored. Also, the private Hermes alley should be researched to find PLANNER <br />a solution. Mr. Uban pointed out that there are a number of ways property can <br />be rezoned and one way is through partial rezoning (keeping a portion of the <br />property R-1 which would provide a better buffed. He also suggested that. St. <br />Marys Street could be cul-de-saced at Larpenteur to assure no traffic generated <br />from the restaurant could enter the street and more leased parking could be <br />negotiated with Bucks. Neighborhood input is very valuable. <br />Ted Meyer, 1710 St. Marys Street, .the immediate property owner ad3acent to the TED MEYER <br />Croft property, stated that to re2one the Croft property to general business 1710 ST. <br />would not provide the protection to the neighborhood that that property will MARYS <br />always remain a parking lot- will the Lido be there in the future? He felt <br />that the rezoning would have a terrific impact on the neighborhood and he is <br />confident that his property would be devalued from between $10,000 to $20,000. <br />Mr. Meyer .was disappointed at the Crofts application to request rezoning <br />since it take <br />s money out of his pocket and puts money into the Croft's pocket-- <br />it is unprece~ <br />ndeted. The real issue in rezoning .is .that it has to be good for <br />the public and~in this case it is not since there is no significant benefit. <br />It is determintal to the Falcon Heights residential community since it is a <br />nice place to live and an intrusion. into his neighborhood. The Croft property <br />is not a blighted area. Mr. Meyer was also concerned about the increased <br />traffic, noise, and the type of clientele that would be frequenting the area. <br />It is a bad plan and makes no sense. The process in which it has been handled <br />is abomonable --no neighbors were contacted in the initial phase. Other <br />developments have involved in neighborhood committees and this process has <br />