PCMin_85Feb4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMIS . FEBRUARY 4, 19E PAGE 4 Member Olson a~ access for the that he had nor to work with tr Labalestra repl whithin reason, upon the neighf Fred A. Kueppe Hermes, referr referred to th approached for zoning ordinan SION MEETING ked if Mr. Labalestra had any objection to an emergency St. Marys neighborhood to which Mr. Labalestra replied e. Member Olson then asked if they would be willing e citizens and the city on landscaping to which Mr. ied that they would be willing to landscape and berm, to make it a separate entity so that it would not infringe orhood. Jr. Attorney at Law, representing Mr. and Mrs. Norbert to his letter of February 4, 1985. Specifically, he private alley and Mr. and Mrs. Hermes have not been urchase or use. Also, parking is inconsistent with the MEMBER OLSON/ LABALESTRA FRED A. KUEPPERS, JR., REPRESENTING MR. AND MRS. HERMES Member Olson sp'pke in favor of the conditional use request because it is OLSON important that the Lido Restaurant has been in the City for 28 years and has always been a good neighbor to the community. It is important that the Planning Commission and City Council take an interest in successful business who have contributed to the community. Jim Bykowski felt that the Planning Commission either approving or BYKOWSKI disapproving the conditional use as presented without the vacation of St. Marys is unacceptable; the Planning Commission is working on an • issue that satisfies no one. Member Wallin clarified the conditional use request--razing of the Croft WALLIN home and use of'the lot for parking as well as using a portion for cul- de-sacing at so e future date as well as vacation of St. Marys, which he felt went ha~id in hand. He felt there was a technicality. Mr. Labalestra indi~ated that the only item they were askirgfor in the conditional usel,request was the use of the entire Croft property for parking in its ~ntirexy. Chairman Stefan on spoke in disapproval of the conditional use but would CHAIRMAN be in favor of ~cheme E and would hope the Lido Restaurant would consider STEFANSON submittingit fob approval. Member Trent-Sullivan felt that after hearing the discussion, she felt the MEMBER TRENT- Croft house should remain in tact. She also liked Scheme E and for any plan SULLIVAN to work that world allow the Lido Restaurant to develop like to and have adequate parking will not just involve permit of the c~mplete Croft lot for parking, which she the real estate values of the people in close proximity use of a private alley and the vacation of St. Marys. people in the a~ea that will be most greatly affected. d in the way they would the conditional use felt would affect but will also involve Lt will not serve the The residents do eserve some pr tection of their property values. She is against the conditional use. Member Mead staled that Scheme E also appealed to him since it was the best of all worlds. He als~ asked what would happen to the value of the Croft lot with one • row of cars-the'ilot itself will depreciate. If there is problems in keeping it MEMBER owner occupied c~r rented, it might become an eyesore. Cannot approve the MEAD conditional use for the entire Croft lot.