PCMin_89Jul10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes Regular Planning Commission Meeting July 10, 1989 Page 2 • Chairman Black then opened the Public Hearing at 8:30 P.M. on Code Amendments to Section 9-4.O1, Subdivision 4, and Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(c). Such Public Hearing Notice was published in the Focus Newspapers on June 28, 1989. Council Liaison Wallin arrived at 8:39 P.M. Planner Tim Malloy reviewed the Code Amendment changes made on June 5, 1989 and made suggestions for other options that might be considered instead of using the conditional use process. There being no one wishing to be heard, Chairman Black closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 P.M. Carroll moved, seconded by Duncan, that the third paragraph of Page 2 (Accessory buildings, including garages, on a corner lot in a residential district, may be located within the corner side yard subject to a conditional use permit. The issuance of such permits shall comply with the provision in Section 9-15.04 of this Code (conditional uses). Design and placement of such structures must be consistent with the surrounding residential district, and shall be evaluated based on the following criteria: visibility, height, safety and potential distraction to passing motorists.) be stricken and the following language substituted: Garages on a corner lot in a residential district shall have the same corner side yard setback as the principal structure. • If required setback allows garage to be placed less than 15 feet from the corner side lot line, this is permissible only if vehicular access door faces either the a11ev or interior lot line. After a discussion, the motion was approved subject to editing by Planner Malloy that would create no substantive change. Boche moved, seconded by Carroll, an amendment to Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 2 (d) as follows: d. Through Lot: The minimum setback from the rear. street o~-a3~ey lot line of a through lot shall be thirty (30) feet. Motion carried unanimously. Daykin requested an illustration be used in Section 9-2.04 of our Code similar to the one used by the City of Minnetonka as was presented to the Planning Commission by Planner Malloy. Carroll moved, seconded by Boche, approval of Code Amendments to Section 9-4.01, Subdivision 4, Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(c) and Section 9-2.04, Subdivision 2(d) to be considered by the City Council as a block of changes. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING ON CODE AMENDMENTS 9-4.01, SUBD. 4, 9-2.04, SUBD. 1(c) AND 9-2.04, SUBD. 2(d) APPROVED •