Laserfiche WebLink
~' <br />~~^3 <br />REVIEWING DEFINITIONS OF ACCESSORY STR \~ <br />9-1.02, Subdivision 2. Definitions. <br />1. Accessory Building. A subordinate building or a portion <br />of the min build'irg, which is located on the same lot <br />as the main building and the purpose of which is clearly <br />incidental to that of the principal building. <br />This definition of an accessory structure inclnt)es attached garages as <br />an accessory building in all zones because attad~ed garages are clearly <br />a subordinate use of the principal building. Nren combined with the <br />following Code sections: <br />9-2.04 Accessory Buildings and Structures. Subdivision 1. General. <br />e. Accessory buildings in the busit~ees and industry districts <br />shall be located any place to the rear of the principal <br />building, subject to the Building Gbde, and the fire <br />zone regulations. <br />f. No detached garages or other aopa+seocy building shall <br />be located nearer to the front 2t~t tine than <br />the principal building on that tot. <br />Applying 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(e) the Code restricts attached garages <br />in business and industry districts to the rear of the principal structure. <br />This is desirable. Truck traffic is less visible. And a business facade <br />is more attractive than a garage on the main thora~ghfare. <br />However, under 9-2.04, Subdivision 1(f) no attached garages in any district <br />can be placed in front of the principal structure, even when all setbacks <br />are maintained. Given the fact that Falcon Woods has number of homes <br />built with the attached garages in front of the principal structure and <br />that it is a fairly common building style, it might be useful to exempt <br />attached garages in residential zones from this requirement. In order <br />to avoid huge garages when setbacks are easily poet, I propose limiting <br />the size of the garage to a four car garage. <br />A second definition of accessory structure apQears in the Code. <br />9-2.04 Accessory Buildings and Structures ~bdivision 1. General. <br />(b) An accessory building shall be considered as an integral <br />part of the principal building if it is located Tess than twelve (12) <br />feet from the principal building with respect to firewall and other <br />requirements of the Building Code and this Oode_ <br />As it stands, this portion of the Code allows any accessory structure <br />within twelve (12) feet of the principal structure to be considered part <br />of the principal structure. It was originally ietended to assure that <br />an accessory structure close to the principal structure meets the Fire <br />Code and Uniform Building Code. However, the addition of "and this C1ode" <br />creates the following problems: it conflicts with the other definition <br />of accessory structure, and, it potentially allows all accessory structures <br />within twelve (12) feet of the principal building to be defined as the <br />principal structure, and subject to rules governing principal rather than <br />accessory structures. Using this definition, an accessory building could <br />go in front of a principal structure. I recamend eliminating "and this <br />Oode" for clarification. <br /> <br />