Laserfiche WebLink
r~ <br />.~ ;~ <br />.• ~`NOV 03 '89 15~ 28 CF&A ~ ~ ~ <br />t} P.3 <br />i• <br />~.~ <br />7. Grrove commoazs: <br />. As everything in the Grove is up 4n the air right now, i think the only <br />reasonable to do ie table this for whatever the proper procedure is). I <br />vicenild call/write the U and ask them to resubmit a formal request when they <br />have a ~posal~ <br />what about the islands? hat's their current status, and probable future? <br />a s, t we should probably be Prepared to address <br />them with the common .areas when the time eataes. <br />8. City, easement in Grove: t'm not very clear on this, t...questions: Could we <br />relinquish the easement as part of a trade with the U far a future easement (ar <br />other mechanism which allows access), if requested by the City, directly east of <br />the current easement (through the currentlfuture space), to allow future <br />access tp the proposed waIlcrway? <br />9. Compost orcTinance: Yf the PC arni CC approve, I w suggest we actively <br />notify all FH residents and give them whatever gui+c~lihes we have -- let's not <br />have this "hit the fan" in the spring... <br />Er~d of ARC's comments on l1/6/89 agenda. <br />• <br />