My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission_1974
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
197x
>
1974
>
Planning Commission_1974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 10:08:26 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 9:50:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION A: Charge, Assumptions, Methods <br />b-: > <br />~-_l <br />.' x. <br />If any of these three assumptions is invalid, and continues to be <br />invalid, .then the physical planning process here outlined will be <br />t t stud the validity of these as- <br /> <br />futile . Our primary task was no o y <br />sumptions, though we have been eager to do anything we can to en- <br />sure their validity. We were asked to comment on them as they <br />affect our physical planning work. <br />Concurrent with the physical planning study, the University fs <br />developing the functions required to ensure the validity of these <br />assumptions: one is a central information predictive /evaluative <br />function under the department of Budget Planning and Information <br />Systems; another is the reorganization of Planning, Operations and <br />Finance, including an Office of Space Programming and Management. <br />• <br />i <br /> <br />q, Planning is a Process. <br />A development plan can no longer be seen as a blueprint, to be <br />implemented piece by piece. It requires continuous re-evaluation <br />and refinement as time goes by and circumstances change. This <br />changes. the emphasis of physical planning from pretty drawings to <br />that of establishing procedures,` design criteria, .and development <br />strategies to satisfy University goals. . <br />5. Planning to a General Destination. <br />A general destination is a necessary guideline for planning, falling <br />between the extremes of no trend prediction at all on the one hand <br />(which might be called ad hoc planning) and detailed attempts to <br />forecast the future on the other (which_•might be called blueprint plan- <br />ning) . There seems to be a widening understanding within the Univer- <br />sity of the need to develop a General Destination picture, and a good <br />deal of significant activity is current in this regard. It will be very <br />important t'riat this dialogue be fir^:ly established as a continuing fea- <br />ture of University life, properly coordinated -and articulated, so that <br />the image of the' General Destination will be constantly up-graded and <br />refined. This is as true of the physical as the institutional and aca- <br />demic destination images., <br />6. The Physical Environment matters. <br />The goals of physical planning are to create an environment to fit the <br />needs of its inhabitants by creating beauty, vitality, convenience, <br />efficiency, privacy where needed, ahd an easy mixing of people and <br />disciplines . Every effort should be made to make the campus rich <br />and satisfying, and the Univers ty should aet as an exemplar of good <br />planning and design. <br />,., ~ 12 <br />~} <br />~w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.