Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I~Sap~or ti;a,rkent~.~r.; <br />Tillage Council ~dembers <br />~~"~ ~ Application from. Arthur Lndig to amend :the Village '~onin~• <br />Cirdinance No. 6~~, as amended, by rezoning certain property <br />in the,. V.i:llage from part of a it-l one family. residential <br />district to part of ~.' i~-2 one and tk*v f~sni~.y residential <br />district. The legal description of said property is as <br />follo~~~s <br />I,ct 3, Block 1, LindigPs 3rd addition (88.385x289..5), <br />The ~'lannin;~, Commission he3.d a public hearing ~.t the Village Hall on <br />Tuesday, October 10, 172 at 8:00 P.~!i, to cansider rezoning of the <br />above property. P'rese~it ~.t tlxe meeting, in addtian to aJ.l the members <br />of the .Funning Cci«nissioz~ ,and Trustees Black acid Ecklund wexe Art <br />and _~red Lindig and 1L~ residents frr~m the immediate' area. <br />Thy Wino neighbors tiaho spoke indicated they were opnased to the re- <br />aonin~; as they wanted. t;he area kept a`ane-family residential one. Their. <br />eoirtments covered the fallowing points r <br />l . Re-zoning one 1 at to x-2 wauld lower the value of the <br />neighbarirx~ ha~ies, <br />~. 1~ double un~ralow might lead to traffic problems with <br />panting on the street, as tii.e bungalow might be rented to as many:.as <br />.fauz° students in eaeSx unit; <br />3. The re-zoning of the one lot might lead to•`.requ.ests for <br />re-zoning of other Jots near it, <br />The Plannir~ Commission members found it difficult to appraise the results <br />of re-zoning ~ti~tSiout a clearer picture of just how the lot taould be used. <br />Tf a de.f'inite s]{etch of the type of structure to be built were presented, <br />the decision of irhe';her or nat to re-zone would be more meaningfully <br />made. Hen~;e, at this time. the Planning Commissian would recarrmend to <br />the Council that the petitian for re-zoning be denied.` <br />Sincerely .yours, <br />. Ceorge M. Y1ant, CYxairman <br />t <br />