Laserfiche WebLink
Page. 2 - ~etober 23, Y973 <br /> -~,. <br /> of this sort the owner occupant does have a vested interest and <br /> normally in most cases the property is kept up faith some ex- <br /> ceptions. "If the owner occupant has had no previous experience <br /> than. thatof a landlord they normally rent to tenants who have <br /> not been screened out. Consequently, the .same situation as I <br /> .pointed out in paragraph one and.two prevails. <br /> ~F.' I drrite you this information and I realize that there are <br /> exceptions to the points I have stated above, but I do believe <br /> that they are a few and far between. I highly recommend to <br /> the council and to the planning board that they do not rezone <br /> the property to R-2 and continue ,to have it zoned as R-1. I <br /> am sure that the parties who ha~ejiseived notice of the applica- <br /> tion to rezone have had their homes built with the idea in mind <br /> that the land involved would eventually have sir~le family <br /> residencies rather than duplexes or double bungalows adjacent <br /> to them and their concern is that if this property is rezoned <br /> there is a. possibility. their property could depreciate in value <br />j or that at the time of-sale they could not realize the amount <br /> that normally could have if the property remained as is. <br /> Your consideration of the above points in making the decision <br /> will`be;verymuch appreciated by me. <br /> <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> ~' :_~_ <br /> .--~'` ~ <br /> ~ <br />~ <br /> S. <br />,. Fus <br />eah <br /> SJFssp2 ' <br /> .~ , <br /> <br />