Planning Commission_1965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mi~TING OF TFiK FALCON HgIGHT~ F?I~JiRiI~IPrIG Ct7&9btiI~SI(N March 22, 1965 F'Fti!~s Pl~.nt, Hindsrmanrt, Otis and Hardie ~~ s Larson sand Libby The meeting rays called to order gat ?;30 p.m. 1. yir. Fleury Kristal, President of fibers 8~*etem, Inc. t present to explain his appliastion far sign .and eat back var$nces far a parapasedEmbex~s rasta~ rant to be built on taro lots at 17~.~1 Snel.~.ing ;Ave. N.s Ke3,ler I~earrangment for Block 10. Thee plan for the restaurant provides for a rectangular building with ~, tri•~ angul®r shapgd ~ntr-ante which extends fa~r~rard five f+a+et. The bt3i3~dis~g 1~ .e roof' xhich overhangs the building lire by five feet, a~aeept ova.. the front ~ntxance ~~ehere it av+erh8ngs sight feet. The 1?~ p3~sw shamed the front entrance of the building set back 8 feet Pram the lot line, a-hich auvu]~d re~uirs, a variance from th+e required bC? ~ met back, ~xirty five Barking spaces ~~are ~g3rovided, arhi.ch is more thaxi r~viz~ed by the ordinance. ; The Embers sign to be ~assd has ai.ppraximgtsly 250 8tft~ars feet -- re~ttairi~g::rage variance permit a~ the ardinartce gives ~ maximum cif' x.00 s~ua,re feet. ~'. Kri~tal +explaincad that hs felt the restaurant had to~lose to the front lot line in order to be v3eible Exam 5ne].ling -- especially if knelling becomes daprestisd. Fie painted out that i~'ebbers r+®sta.urant is set back only about 15 fe$t from the line. n'asked about the sire of the sign, he paid.that a31 of -their signs rtes that size sold #~ tiaa,t they aware s trademark. It xould be almost impogssible to alter it. The F'l.snning Commission members felt that bec~e.use ~8ebbers is tea dose tc the front let 7 i.ne is ao reason far putting another building tov close, , Q,2pv, ~rhen the int+erehange is built, the service rc~,d may require more space than the present one,~and hence a. building shauldnft be too class to the line or it might have to be condemned. It eras noted that must of the homes a7,ong~nelling north of 7axpent~eur .are set back 25 feet. Mt3TION;: Mr. (7tis ~ motive amts passed to recamr~end that the ViZle.ge Council gr~a.nt a variance to idr. Kristal arhich Kould permit the building of =a res- taura.nt with :a 25 ~ set back fca~r the front X11 of the main structure (net the (rant sntre.nce peak arrhi~ch~~~~in be 20 ~ .) (T... roof atrerhang at th8 fraat peak extends 8 ~ arhic g~, it to e~.thin 12 ~ o~ tla~ xront property lot line.) In the discussion of the :size of tree sign, it pointed out ti~at if .a sign this large permi%ted, the vth+er bus3nessa-en in the ni]lage atc>uld feel the right to rs~u~e$t larger s igxu3 . Mt~I(3Nr Mr. Fiinderma,nn ~s motion aa.s gassed to recommend to tk~ Village Council that the main pEmers n peert of the sign be reduced to •egprwtimatsly 100 square feet, :aTrl the rent of the sign be reduced i.n proportion. It ~uas further recommended that the sign ba set back 3.2 feet from the front property line,..znd kept in the same ralatian to the me,i.n building $s sham in the projected p7sen.