Laserfiche WebLink
Plant <br />-2- October 7, 196 <br />~. <br />~snd ordinance number b~+ was adopted ~ib~nt <br />thereto, in l~bl. <br />-The.side lot setback requirements prohibit <br />the erec`ticm of structures within a 5 foot dis- <br />Lance of the .side lot line. Ordinance number 6~+, <br />;,.' section 3.2, subdivision (59) defines structure <br />a~ "anything constructed or erected, the use of <br />which:requires a location on the ground or ,attached <br />1..- ,~ .. r. ~- tro ~~nethjn~ having a lo~cati~h on°. trie g'rnund-. -' .. <br />Ur~i~er the broad definition this would prohibit the- <br />eonstruetivn of driveways within 5 feet of a side <br />3rpt .~.ne. Further, section J.4.2, subdivision (88) <br />requires ~hdt within all "R".districts vehicles <br />normall~towned or kept by the occupants of the <br />prefnises must have a garage stall or parking-space <br />on- the l.ot in a 3ocation other than a res~.uired yard, <br />except t4'-at the parking may be located in a rear <br />;,yard to within g feet of the rear lot line and any <br />s~.de yard to_within ~ feet of an interior Bide lot <br />l3.ne. This would prohibit tyre parking o#' vehicles <br />on~the driveway if there were to be a mutual drive- <br />way within 5 feet of the side yard. Practical ex- <br />perience has also shown that while the present <br />owners might have an agreement as to the maintenance <br />and use of a mutual. driveway, their successors in <br />interests might not enjoy the same degree of cooper- <br />anon. <br />MJG;bb <br />Enclosure <br />Veiy truly .yours, <br />~ ~. <br />', <br />'~ r ; <br />~~. J. Gdiviri, Jr, <br />