Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 <br />.. pattern rosy be necessar~f becsuse o~ the location as e;,~.stirg <br />utilities and other enginee~'i~ reasons, and. is an o~~~' op's.n3.on <br />a good solution. t~The =disadvantage sFdt~hably redue~d in~size~F <br />' course, tY~t the P-ZA arEa is ezaro <br />Development psttern "A" has b~enA zor.~rj~c~,ptund,~ k the o erlay hc~s been~y <br />to the ofFicial zoning map- <br />changed 3ndict~t3.ng ~~he reco.:mzonded. zon~.~ areas t~~a'c should be applied i <br />this development ~at~;ern is agreed. upon. <br />The University properties to the wesT ,ae suggest b~ ~.one~c~ fop-I`tzone nnorth <br />conforming to the "D°~~~ district. sIe havQ?ze `°vsrsi'~y tY~attisuch multiple <br />of the "P-T" District s.s an indica~.ion to t <br />housing could be carstruci;ed s,t the ~authT~l~y Ypio~.a1 ~o~e de Teloaed astsiingle <br />Cleveland Avenue artd that she noi~the..l,~ T <br />family homes. The University, of cotxss, lrs.s x~ectuzst°d thst nll og this <br />property be zoned "P°Z" . In view of the~sst~~~~ ~ f`~ ths``U~versity constructs <br />dential area to the west however, Sae s~..g,, <br />additional new s3,nglc Family homes (ano~+:her tiniversi~,y Gaove east this is <br />the area where such construction should occur. <br />All other University properties we ,urges"c could be `ppxopri,ately <br />two egccp~;i ~°?S <br />zoned "P-I" zone with the i'ol.l.o,~.ng <br />a. The property behind 1~-zndo Photo ahwesterlyZ~`om golZ~.,~tood Court. <br />straight east-west line extending ~, erties ~zs discussed <br />If the University is able to exchange p.. op <br />at the last hearing this would. produce $ reasoranble develaprtent <br />depth for private properties west of the yillsge IIa11 to Fairview <br />Avenue. <br />rently been agreed <br />b. ~ open agricu7.,tural zone is suggest and fro ernes north of yarpenteur <br />~_upon by the University for-the University P p <br />Avenue and east of Fair•,riew Avenue . The University Yeas indicated their <br />intent to utilize this prno~ con tituteianytliabili~ty tostheir'Future <br />thus such a zoning would <br />development. Our origine.l recommendationosi~o o~tnO~ suggests'the devey <br />be zoned single Family. '.mat is to says <br />lopment of pubs i~°~institutior~al build.irga in this a~~eao how should <br />' of the Falcon Deights si?~;le ft~tni.ly residential~nsi ~ eventually wove <br />the University retain this property for many ye• <br />the agricultural operatioilstt°nstimosa considermb~lesned Farhthe u~seht <br />well be at some future pain <br />of this property as a m°~~4'>' pa~'k site. Ui~lsss a better fob is done in <br />the next several ell besconsidexable.side such reg;Lona.l park areas, <br />this need night <br />oses of the Ordinance teams: this district might ws~-~- be termed "P-~" <br />For pure This should be set up in tYie text as a separate <br />Public Open space district. of the sections following. <br />section, section 13, necessitating the yenumberin6 <br />'t7Ais district will be somewYsat ques ~ionableessAt~~n~~ ~ aet~t~ng a propriate <br />thus suggest tYiat you rely upon your Villrag <br />~rording• (hir suggestions axe as Pollows~ <br />