Laserfiche WebLink
appraisal on whether the other five surrounding property values <br /> were affected. <br /> The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> C. Kuettel moved to grant all variances as needed for the 988 sq. <br /> foot garage based upon the findings. <br /> C. Lampi seconded the motion. <br /> C. Salzberg asked that the condition that the structure not be <br /> rebuilt if it were over 50% destroyed be added. <br /> Discussion on this specific condition followed. <br /> Mr. Brace was asked if he would hold the city harmless from any <br /> damages if he was granted the variances. He said he could not <br /> respond to that question because he was only prepared to seek <br /> assurances for thier four car garage. <br /> Chairperson Barry asked for further discussion. <br /> C. Boche asked for a roll call vote. <br /> C. Andrews aye <br /> C. Barry nay <br /> C. Boche aye <br /> C. Huso nay <br /> C. Kuettel aye <br /> C. Lampi aye <br /> C. Salzberg nay <br /> Chair Barry stated that the necessary variances for a 988 sq. <br /> foot garage passed by a 4 to 3 vote based upon stated findings. <br /> And that the planning commission would be recommending the <br /> granting of the variances to the city council. <br /> A motion was made to extend the planning commission meeting <br /> beyond 10 p.m. Unanimously approved. <br /> REOUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A VARIANCE AT 2097 FOLWELL AVENUE <br /> In May, 1992, the planning commission approved a variance for <br /> a sideyard setback for a proposed new home at 2097 Folwell. This <br /> variance granted a 1 1/2 foot variance in the eastside lot line <br /> for the northeastern rear five feet of the structure. A surveyor <br /> on the job called attention to the fact that the required <br /> sideyard setback is not 5 feet on this property, but 20% of the <br /> lot width (21', 4 because the property abuts an existing public <br /> right -of -way. The five foot setback requirement is for property <br /> abutting residential property. <br /> 7 <br />