Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS <br /> APPLICATION FOR THE PEACEMAKER AWARD <br /> 21 APRIL 1993 <br /> Introduction <br /> In March of 1991 the city of Falcon Heights successfully worked <br /> with the Dispute Resolution Center to resolve a disagreement <br /> between the city and the owners of three properties over an <br /> easement acquisition for a proposed sidewalk that was part of a <br /> major county street improvement project. <br /> This success not only resolved the dispute over the easement <br /> acquisition, it also improved the communication between the city <br /> and these property owners, and influenced how the city currently <br /> works with property owners to plan street projects. <br /> Background <br /> Dispute resolution was selected to settle this disagreement <br /> rather than formal legal channels for three reasons: <br /> 1) A councilmember familiar with dispute resolution <br /> promoted its use for city issues. <br /> 2) The city wanted a forum to sit and talk with property <br /> owners to build a better rapport rather than possibly <br /> alienating them further with formal legal proceedings <br /> (This street project had been an alienating process <br /> already.) <br /> 3) The city wanted to save the legal expenses from formal <br /> court proceedings, an estimated $8,000 to $10,000. <br /> Situation <br /> Over a three year period, the county worked with the city to <br /> approve a county road project that included a major street <br /> widening and a new sidewalk. The sidewalk was initiated and <br /> being paid for by the city. During this process property owners <br /> expressed concerns about the street width, the proposed property <br /> assessment and the new sidewalk where one currently did not <br /> exist. <br /> Due to the extra street width, the public right -of -way did not <br /> provide enough space for the public sidewalk and required the <br /> acquisition of an easement along seven properties. Owners of <br /> four properties accepted the city's initial purchase offer for <br /> the easement. However, owners of three properties refused the <br /> offer even after several discussions. <br />